Factors associated with non-participation in a health screening programme and its barriers: Findings from the Community Empowers the Nation Programme (KOSPEN), Malaysia 2016
AbstractIntroduction: The Ministry of Health, Malaysia had introduced the community based action programme (KOSPEN) to improve the early detection of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the population. This study aims to identify factors associated with non-participation in screening activities and its barriers. Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted from May to June 2016 in KOSPEN localities. A total of 2354 adults aged 18 years and above were selected using a two-stage stratified cluster sampling design. The data were obtained through face-to-face interviews using validated questionnaires. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the sociodemographic factors associated with non-participation in health screening. Results: Out of 2156 respondents interviewed (response rate of 91.6%), approximately 75% (n=1624) of the respondents did not participate in the KOSPEN health screening programme. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that, males (aOR: 2.35, 95% CI 1.21, 4.55) and those working in private sector (aOR: 2.11, 95% CI 1.21, 3.67) were more likely to not participate in health screening. While, age, ethnicity, level of education, marital status and household income were not significantly associated with non-participation in health screening. The reasons for not participated were “did not know health screening was conducted in their localities” (39.3%) and had no time to attend the programme (18.2%). Conclusions: The findings are of public health concern as about 75% of respondents failed to participate in this programme due to lack of awareness of the health screening activities. The use of social networks should be considered to increase participation in the programme. Keywords: non-communicable diseases, KOSPEN, health screening, Malaysia.
Catherine PB, Gregory AR, Andrew EM. The Global Burden of Disease Study and the Preventable Burden of NCD. Global Heart. 2016;11(4):393-97
Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Maghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012; 380(9859):2197–223
Samira HH, Soma S. Burden of non-communicable disease:Global overview. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. 2010; 4:41–47
World Health Organization (WHO). Global action plan for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases 2013-2020. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013
Krishnan A, Ekowati R, Baridalyne N, Kusumawardani N, Suhardi, Kapoor SK, Leowski J. Evaluation of community-based interventions for non-communicable diseases: experiences from India and Indonesia. Health Promotion Int. 2010; 26(3):276-89
Institute for Public Health (IPH). National Health and Morbidity Survey 2011 (NHMS 2011). Vol. II: Non-Communicable Diseases. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health Malaysia; 2011.
Institute for Public Health (IPH). National health and morbidity survey 2015 (NHMS 2015). Vol. II: non-communicable diseases, risk factors & other health problems. Kuala Lumpur: Institute for Public Health, 2016
Ministry of Health (MOH). National strategic plan for non-communicable disease. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health, 2010
World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable diseases in the Western Pacific Region: a profile. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012
Roura LC, Arulkumaran SS. Facing the noncommunicable disease (NCD) global epidemic e The battle of prevention starts in utero-The FIGO challenge. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2015:29; 5-14.
Benziger CP, Roth GA, Moran AE. The global burden of disease study and the preventable burden of NCD. Global Heart. 2016:11(4): 393-397.
Denman CA, Belly ML, Cornejo E, de Zapieny JG, Carvajaly S, Scott Carvajaly S, Rosalesy C. Changes in Health Behaviors and Self-Rated Health of Participants in Meta Salud : A Primary Prevention Intervention of NCD in Mexico. Global Heart. 2015;10(1): 55-61.
Gaziano TA, Abrahams-Gessel S, Denman CA, Montano CM, Khanam M, Puoane T, Levitt NS. An assessment of community health workers’ ability to screen for cardiovascular disease risk with a simple, non-invasive risk assessment instrumentin Bangladesh, Guatemala, Mexico, and South Africa: an observational study. Lancet. 2015;3:556–63
Checkley W, Ghannemx H, Irazolak V, Kimaiyo S, Rabadán-Diehl C, Ramirez-Zea M, Rubinsteink A, Sigamani A, Smith R. Management of NCD in low- and middle-income countries. Global Heart. 2014; 9(4): 431-43
Ministry of Health (MOH)/Community Development Department (KEMAS). Healthy Community Empowers the Nation (KOSPEN) project. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health, 2013.
Institute for Public Health (IPH). Technical report evaluation of the implementation of “Komuniti Sihat Perkasa Negara” programme in Malaysia (KOSPEN) 2016. Kuala Lumpur: Institute for Public Health, 2016
World Health Organization (WHO). 2008-2013 Action plan for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008
Institute for Public Health (IPH). Technical report evaluation of effectiveness of implementation of “Komuniti Sihat Perkasa Negara” (KOSPEN) programme in Malaysia- phase 1. Kuala Lumpur: Institute for Public Health, 2015
Noguchi R, Shen J. Factors affecting participation in health checkups: Evidence from Japanese survey data. Health Policy. 2018 (in press)
Bar-Dayan Y, Boaz M, Landau Z, Zeev F, Jakubowicz D, Wainstein J, Using a public health station for screening of undiagnosed dysglycemia and hypertension. Primary Care Diabetes. 2016;10: 324–28
Wall M, Teeland L. Non-participants in a preventive health examination for cardiovascular disease: characteristics, reasons for non-participation, and willingness to participate in the future. Scandinavian J Primary Health Care. 2004; 22(4):248-51
Vermunt PW, Milder IE, Wielaard F, Van Oers JA, Westert GP: An active strategy to identify individuals eligible for type 2 diabetes prevention by lifestyle intervention in Dutch primary care: the APHRODITE study. Fam Pract. 2010; 27:312–19
Lambert AM, Burden AC, Chambers J, Marshall T. Cardiovascular screening for men at high risk in heart of Birmingham Teaching Primary Care Trust: the 'Deadly Trio' programme. J Pub Health. 2012;34:73–82
Burioni R, Contucci P, Fedele M, Vernia C, Vezzani A. Enhancing participation to health screening campaigns by group interactions. Scientific Reports. 2015;5: 9904
Carpenter CJ. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Health Belief Model variables in predicting behaviour. Health Promotion. 2010;25: 661-69
Hyung KY, DongWS, Seung SH, Juwhan O, Be LC. Regional Factors Associated with Participation in the National Health Screening Programme: A Multilevel Analysis Using National Data. J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28: 348-56
Engebretson J, Mahoney JS, Walker G. Participation in community health screenings: a qualitative evaluation. J Community Health Nursing. 2005;22(2):77–92
Funahashi H, Nishida T, Okamura Y, Sakakibara H. Attributes of non-participants aged 40-59 years in specific health check-ups. Japanese J Public Health. 2013;60(3):119-27
Harte E, MacLure C, Martin A, Saunders CL, Meads C, Walter FM, Griffin SJ, Mant J, Usher-Smith BJ. Reasons why people do not attend NHS Health Checks: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Br J Gen Pract. 2018; 68 (666): 28-35
Tagbo BN, EkeCB Omotowo BI, Onwuasigwe CN, Onyeka EB, Mildred UO. Vaccination coverage and its determints in children aged 12-23 months in an urban district of Nigeria. World J Vaccine 2014;4:175-83
Copyright (c) 2020 lim kuang kuay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.IJPHR applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication byIJPHR, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that IJPHR content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.