COMMUNITY BASED APPROACH TOWARDS DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN MALAYSIA (PENDEKATAN BERASASKAN KOMUNITI DALAM PENGURUSAN BENCANA DI MALAYSIA)

Authors

  • Haliza Abdul Rahman Institute for Social Science Studies (IPSAS)/ Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Abstract

Abstract

A disaster is an occurrence disrupting the normal conditions of existence and causing a level of suffering that exceeds the capacity of adjustment of the affected community. The current and future practice to handle or manage the disaster is with the participating and involving of the community towards that. Thus, community awareness has fundamental and their role are the necessary starting point for all other disaster risk reduction initiative. Therefore, to establish a sustainable and resilient environment for the local community, the government must encourage the participation and involvement of community in disaster risk reduction programmes. Furthermore, empowering community within disaster threatened is the key to successful mitigation. However, the roles of community in this issue are often undervalued and at time ignored too. Normally, disaster control measures planned without participation of the affected communities and other stakeholders are unsustainable as they do not meet the needs of relevant stakeholders. These situations can be overcome by establishing participatory planning process. In this context, decision making is a combination of ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches which enables the involvement of all stakeholders on the basis of equity. For conclude, the role of communities in disaster management in Malaysia could be improves.

Keywords: Community Based Approach, Community, Awareness, Disaster, Participate and Involve

 

Abstrak

 

Bencana adalah kewujudan kejadian yang menjejaskan keadaan sedia ada dan menyebabkan tahap penderitaan yang melampaui kapasiti komuniti yang terjejas. Amalan semasa dan pada masa depan di dalam mengendali atau menguruskan bencana seharusnya melibatkan penyertaan dan pembabitan komuniti. Justeru, kesedaran awam adalah perkara asas dan peranan mereka adalah titik permulaan yang diperlukan untuk semua inisiatif berkaitan pengurangan risiko bencana. Oleh itu, untuk mewujudkan persekitaran yang mampan dan berdaya tahan untuk masyarakat setempat, kerajaan seharusnya menggalakkan penyertaan dan penglibatan komuniti dalam program pengurangan risiko bencana. Tambahan pula, memperkasakan komuniti adalah kunci kejayaan kepada pengurangan daripada ancaman bencana. Namun, peranan komuniti dalam isu ini kerap kali tidak diberi perhatian sewajarnya dan pada masa yang sama diabaikan. Umumnya, langkah-langkah kawalan bencana yang dirancang tanpa penyertaan komuniti dan pihak berkepentingan lain yang terjejas tidak dapat diteruskan disebabkan kegagalan dalam memenuhi keperluan pihak berkepentingan yang terlibat. Perkara ini boleh diatasi dengan mewujudkan proses perancangan partisipatif. Dalam konteks ini, pembuatan keputusan merupakan gabungan pendekatan ‘top-down’ dan ‘bottom-up’ yang membolehkan penglibatan semua pihak berkepentingan berdasarkan ekuiti. Kesimpulannya, peranan komuniti dalam pengurusan bencana di Malaysia perlu ditambahbaik.

Kata Kunci: Pendekatan Berasaskan Komuniti, Komuniti, Kesedaran, Bencana, Mengambil Bahagian dan Terlibat

References

ADRC. 2009. ADRC Country Report - Malaysia: Asian Disaster Reduction Center.

AzrinaSobian. 2016. An overview of the participation community and faith-based organisations (FBO) in disaster preparedness in Malaysia. TAFHIM: IKIM Journal of Islam and Contemporary World. 9: 87-111.

Badrudin, AR. 2012. Issues of disaster management preparedness: A case study of Directive 20 f National Security Council in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3:85-86.

Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E. & Thomson, K. 1993.The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.

Blackstock, K. L., G. J. Kelly and B. L. Horsey. 2007. Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics60(4): 726–42.

Carafano, J.J, J.A. Marshall and L.C. Hammond. 2007. Grassroots disaster response: Harnessing the capacities of communities. Backgrounder, No. 2094.The Heritage Foundation. 28 December 2007. p.2.

Buckle, P. 2006.Assessing social resilience, in Paton, D. and Johnston, D. (Eds), Disaster resilience: An integrated approach. Charles Thomas Publisher Ltd: Springfield.88-101.

Chan, N.W. 1995. Flood disaster management in Malaysia: an evaluation of the effectiveness of government resettlement schemes. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal,4(4): 22-29.

Chan, N. W. and D. J. Parker. 1997. Aspek aspek sosio-ekonomi berkaitan dengan bahaya dan bencana banjir di Semenanjung Malaysia, in Agus, M. R. and F. N. Sidin (eds.) Proceedings of Persidangan Kebangsaan Kajian Sains Sosial, 29-30 September 1997. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya, 294-311.

Chan, N. W. 2012. Impacts of disasters and disasters risk management in Malaysia: The case of floods, in Sawada, Y. and S. Oum (eds.), Economic and Welfare Impacts of Disasters in EastAsia and Policy Responses. ERIA Research Project Report 2011-8, Jakarta: ERIA.503-551.

Coles, E. and Buckle, D. 2004. Developing community resilience as a foundation for effective disaster recovery, The Australian Journal of Emergency Management19(4): 6-15.

De la Poterie, A. and Baudoin, M.A. 2015. From Yokohama to Sendai: Approaches to participation in international disaster risk reduction frameworks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 6(2): 128-139.

Dorasamy, M., Raman, M. 2011. Information systems to support disaster planning and response: Problem diagnosis and research gap analysis, Proceedings of the 8th International ISCRAM Conference – Lisbon, Portugal, May 2011. (An ISI Conference Proceedings.

Dyer, J., L. C. Stringer, A. J. Dougill, J. Leventon, M. Nshimbi, F. Chama and S. Syampungani. 2014.Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: Experiences in community engagement from Southern Africa.Journal of Environmental Management137: 137–45.

Godschalk, D.R., Kaiser, E.J. and Berke, P.R. 1998. Integrating hazard mitigation and local land use planning in: R. Burby (Ed.) Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press.

Heijmans, A. 2009. The social life of community-based disaster risk reduction: origins, politics and framing. Disaster Studies Working Paper No. 20, Aon-Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre, London: University College London.

Mercy Malaysia. Disaster reduction.http://www.myhealth.gov.my/en/development-disaster-management-disaster-victim-identification-dvi-malaysia/. [5 February 2018].

Development of Disaster Management and Disaster Victim Identification (DVI) In Malaysia.http://www.myhealth.gov.my/en/development-disaster-management-disaster-victim-identification-dvi-malaysia/. [2 February 2018].

http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN009661.pdf. Resilience refers to the ability to adapt to changing conditions and withstand and rapidly recover from disruption due to emergencies. White House, “Presidental Policy Directive 8 (PPD-8),†March 30, 2011. Accessed on 7 Ferbruary 2018.

Hofmann, C. A. L., Roberts, J., Shoham, P. Harvey. 2004. Measuring the Impact of Humanitarian Aid. A Review of Current Practice. HPG Research Report 17. ODI, London.

Hussaini, Hj. A. 2007.‘Flood and drought management in Malaysia’, Speech Given on 21 June 2007, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

Ibrahim Mohamed Shaluf. 2007. Disaster types. Disaster Prevention and Management 16(5): 704-717.

Jamilah Ahmad and HabibahLateh. 2016. Media and the environment in Malaysia: An analysis on news coverage of landslide disaster in Kuala Lumpur.Malaysian Journal of Communication32(2): 525-544.

Kathleen M. MacQueen, Eleanor McLellan, David S. Metzger, etc. 2001. What is community? An evidence-based definition for participatory public health. Am J Public Health. 2001 December; 91(12): 1929-1938.

Kelman, I. and Mercer, J. 2014. A knowledge integration tool for disaster risk reduction including climate change. In Lopez-Carresi, M., Fordham, M., Wisner, B., Kelman, I. and Gaillard, JC (Eds). Disaster Management: International Lessons in Risk Reduction, Response and Recovery, Earthscan: London.287-299.

Manyena, S.B. 2006. The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters, 30(4): 434-450.

National Security Council, Department of Prime Minister, Malaysia. Directive 20 (Reviewed version). 1997.

Quarantelli. E. L. 1991. Urban Vulnerability to Disasters in Developing Countries: Managing Risks. In Disaster Research Center, 25. Newark: University of Delaware.

Pearce, L. 2003. “Disaster management and community planning and public participation: How to achieve sustainable hazard mitigationâ€. Nature Hazards, 28: 211–28.

Prasana Rosaline Fernandez, Lean, Mei Li, Khor and Yoke Lim. 2013. Media coverage: the Bukit Antarabangsa landslide. Journal of the Southeast Asia Research Centre for Communications and Humanities5(1): 35-55.

Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10): 2417–31.

Rabiul Islam, RoslinaKamaruddin, SitiAznor Ahmad dan lain-lain. 2016. A Review on mechanism of flood disaster management in Asia.International Review of Management and Marketing 6(1): 29-52.

Roosli, R., & O'Brien, G. 2011. Social learning in managing disasters in Malaysia. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal20(4): 386-397.

Samaddar, S., J. Choi, B. A. Misra, and H. Tatano. 2015. Insights on social learning and collaborative action plan development for flood risks mitigation: Practicing Yonmenkaigi System Method (YSM) in flood prone Mumbai.Natural Hazards, 75(2): 1531–54.

Shaw, R. 2006. Critical issues of community- based flood mitigation: Examples from Bangladesh and Vietnam.Science and Culture, 72(1/2): 62.

Thornley, L., Ball, J., Signal, L., Lawson-TeAho, K. and Rawson, E. 2015.Building community resilience: learning from the Canterbury earthquakesâ€, KÅtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online,10(1): 23-35.

Turoff, Hiltz, Banuls, Van Den Eede. 2013. Multiple perspectives on planning for emergencies: An introduction to the special issue on planning and foresight for emergency preparedness and management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(9): 1647-1656.

United Nations. 2006. International strategy for disaster reduction, available at: www.unisdr.org/

United Nations Development Programme. 2004. Reducing disaster risk: A challenge fordevelopment, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, New York, NY.

UNISDR/WMO. May 2012. UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda.Disaster risk and resilience, Thematic Think Piece.

WHO/EHA. 2002. Disasters & emergencies definitions. Panafrican Emergency Training Centre, Addis Ababa.

Wisner, B and Walker, P.JC. 2005. The World Conference on disaster viewed through the lens of political ecology: A dozen big questions for Kobe and Beyond. Capitalism Nature Socialism 16(2):89-95.

Wondolleck, J. and Jaffee, S. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from Innovation in natural resource management. Washington DC: Island Press.

Yodmani, S. 2001. Disaster Risk Management and Vulnerability Reduction: Protecting the Poor. Paperpresented at The Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-01

Issue

Section

Environment & Landscape