STRATEGI PENCEGAHAN BULLYING MELALUI PROGRAM “SEKOLAH CARE” BAGI FASILITATOR SEBAYA (BULLYING PREVENTION STRATEGIES THROUGH THE “CARE SCHOOL” PROGRAM FOR PEER FACILITATOR)

Authors

  • Muthia Aryuni

Abstract

Abstrak

Terdapat 84% anak di Indonesia mengalami kekerasan di sekolah, (Plan International and International Center for Research on Women, 2015). Semakin sering siswa mengalami bullying di sekolah, maka semakin tinggi pula tingkat depresi pada siswa (Ramadhani & Retnowati, 2013). Hasil survei awal yang dilakukan oleh peneliti pada bulan Juli-Agustus 2013, kepada 739 siswa SMA di Yogyakarta menunjukkan bahwa 13.53% siswa mengalami bullying dan 53.58% siswa telah melihat perilaku bullying di sekolah. Bullying Prevention Programs (BPP) telah terbukti mengurangi terjadinya bullying pada siswa, Albayrak dkk (2016). Program pencegahan melalui teman sebaya merupakan salah satu upaya yang bisa dilakukan untuk mencegah perilaku bullying di sekolah. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu menguji strategi pencegahan bullying melalui program pelatihan yang bernama “Sekolah CARE (CAring, Respect & Educate)†untuk meningkatkan keterampilan fasilitator teman sebaya dengan menggunakan metode diskusi kasus, dalam menyampaikan informasi tentang bullying. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah desain kelompok kontrol yang tidak diobati dengan pre-test dan post-test (Shadish & Campbell, 2002). Analisis data kuantitatif menggunakan uji statistik non parametrik uji Mann-Whitney U dengan menganalisis skor gain. Analisis menunjukkan adanya perbedaan yang signifikan antara kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok kontrol, ada peningkatan pengetahuan dan keterampilan untuk memimpin diskusi kasus bullying pada kelompok eksperimen diberi perlakuan (pelatihan Sekolah CARE) dibandingkan dengan kelompok kontrol yang tidak menerima perlakuan.

Kata kunci: Bullying, Fasilitator sebaya, Diskusi kasus

 

Abstract

There are 84% of children in Indonesia experiencing violence in schools (Plan International and International Center for Research on Women, 2015 ). The more students experience bullying into school, the higher the level of depression in students (Ramadhani & Retnowati, 2013). Initial survey results conducted by researchers in July-August 2013, to 739 high school students in Yogyakarta showed that 13.53% of students experience bullying and 53.58% of students have seen bullying behavior in schools. Bullying Prevention Programs (BPP) had been shown to reduce the occurrence of bullying into students, Albayrak et al (2016). Prevention programs through peers are one effort that can be done to prevent bullying behavior in schools. The purpose of this research is to test bullying prevention strategy through training program called " CARE School (CAring, Respect & Educate)" to improve peer facilitator skill by using case discussion method to convey information about bullying. The research design used was an untreated control group design with pre-test and post-test (Shadish & Campbell, 2002). Quantitative data analysis used non-parametric statistical test of Mann-Whitney U test by analyzing gain scores. The analysis showed significant differences between the experimental and control groups, there was an increase in knowledge and skills to lead the discussion of bullying cases in the experimental group treated (CARE School Training) compared to the non-receiving control group.

 

Keywords: bullying, peer facilitators, case discussions

References

Albayrak, S., et al. (2016). Assessing the effect of school bullying prevention programs on reducing bullying. Childern and Youth Services Review 63, 1-9.

Azwar, S. (2005). Sikap manusia, teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2013). Realibitas dan Validitas Edisi Keempat. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought & action a social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Beran, T., Shapiro, B. (2005). Evaluation of an anti-bullying program: student reports of knowledge and confidence to manage bullying. Canadian journal of education 28, 4 (2005): 700-717.

Berger, Christian & Caravita, Simona C.S. (2016). Why do early adolescents bully? Exploring the influence of prestige norms on social and psychological motives to bully. Journal of Adolescence 46, 45-56.

Boehrer, J., & Linsky, M. (1990). Teaching with cases: “Learning to questionâ€. New Directions For Teaching And Learning. 42: 41-57

Byrne, H et al. (2016). Adolescents’ definitions of bullying: the contribution of age, gender, and experience of bullying. Eur J Psychol Educ, 31:403-418.

Carney, J. (2008). Perceptions of bullying and associated trauma during adolescence. Professional School Counseling, 11, 179 –188. doi: 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-11.179.

Chandra, F.O & Mulya, T.W. (2009). Perilaku Pembulian pada Siswa SMA di Surabaya. Anima, Indonesian Psychological Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, 384-264.

Djamarah, S., B., Zain, A. (2006). Strategi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Efobi, A., Nwokolo, C. (2014). Relationship between Parenting Styles and Tendency to Bullying Behavior among Adolescents. Journal of Education & Human Development. March 2014, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 507-521.

Farrington, D.P & Baldry, A.C. (2010). Individual risk factors for school bullying. Journal of Agression, conflict and peace research. Vol.2, Issue 1.

Frelberg, J. F. & Driscoll, A. 1996. Universal Teaching Strategies. Boston: Allyn Bacon.

Gerald, K., & Patton, W. (2007). Adolescent peer counseling: enhancing the natural conversational helping skills of young people. Australian journal of guidance & counselling, 17 Issue 1, p28-48.

Hawker, D. S. J., Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A metaâ€analytic review of crossâ€sectional studies. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 41(4), 441â€455.

Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D., Craig, W. (2001). Peer interventions in playground bullying. Social development, 10, 512-527 http://www.soc.ucb.edu/projects/case/method/casediscussion.pdf [Accessed 10 Maret 2013).

International Centre for Research on Woman. 2015. Pelan International: Research Report of Promoting Equality and Safety in Schools. Washington, D. C.: ICRW.

IPPF/WHR Tools. 2004. Annual Report 2003-2004. International Planned Parenthood Federatio: Western Hemisphere Region. US:IPPF

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson. R. T. 2000. Constructive Controversy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Krueger, D. & Krishna, B. K. 2004. Skill-specific rather than general education: A reason for US-Europe growth difference? Journal of Economic Growth 9(2): 167-207

Majcherova, K., Hajduova, Z., Andrejkovic. (2014). The role of the school in handling the problem of bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior 19, 463-465.

McLean, M. Van wyk, Edith, M. Peters-Futre & Susan B. Higgins-Opitz. 2006. The small group in problems-based learning more than a cognitive ‘learning’ experience for first-year medical students in a diverse population. Medical Teacher 28(40: 94-103.

Migliaccio, T., Raskauskas, J. (2013). Small-Scale Bullying Prevention Discussion Video for Classrooms: A Preliminary Evaluation. Children and School, Vol. 35, No. 2.

Newman, C., Dawn., Horne., Arthur, M. (2004). Bully buster: A psychoeducational intervention for reducing bullying behavior in middle school students. Journal of counseling and development, 82. 259-266.

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.

Padgett, M.S., Notar, C.E. (2013). Bystander are the key to stopping bullying. Universal Journal of Educational Research 1 (2): 33-41.

Ramadhani, A., Retnowati, S. (2013). Depresi pada remaja korban bullying. Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Vol.9, No.2.

Rivers, I et al. (2009). Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quartely, Vo.24, No.4, 211-22328.

Sanjaya, W. 2006. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group

Santrock, J.W. (2003). Life-span development: Perkembangan masa hidup jilid I. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designed for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton mifflin company.

Supratiknya, A. (2011). Merancang program dan modul psikoedukasi. Universitas Sanata Dharma. Yogyakarta.

Tsiantis, A.C.J et al. (2013). The effect of a clinical prevention program on bullying, victimization, and attitudes toward school of elementary school student. Behavioral disorder, 38 (4), 243-257.

Wood, D.F. (2003). “ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Problem based learningâ€. BMJ, 326:328330. Availablefrom: http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/7384/328 (Assessed 10 maret 2013).

Wurf, G. (2012). High School Anti-Bullying Interventions: An Evaluation of Curriculum Aproaches and the Method of Shared Concern in Four Hongkong International Schools. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling. Volume 22, Issue 1, pp.139-149

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1

Section

Language & Heritage

License

Copyright and Licensing

Authors who publish with Asian Journal of Environment, History and Heritage (AJEHH) agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
  • This license permits anyone to share and adapt the work for any purpose, even commercially, provided appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and the source.
  • By submitting to this journal, authors accept that, if their manuscript is accepted, it will be published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.