PENGAJARAN KARANGAN DARIPADA PERPEKTIF HARAPAN MURID SEKOLAH MENENGAH (Teaching Essay from the Perspective of Secondary School Students’ Expectations)

ROZITA MOHAMED YUNEH, RAHIM AMAN, SHAHIDI A. HAMID

Abstract


ABSTRAK: Murid menaruh harapan terhadap guru dalam proses pembelajaran. Makalah ini meneroka aspek harapan murid terhadap pengajaran karangan yang dilihat daripada perspektif tiga orang murid sekolah menengah. Kajian ini berbentuk kajian kes pelbagai kes-pelbagai tempat. Tiga orang murid tingkatan lima terlibat sebagai peserta kajian yang dipilih berdasarkan persampelan bertujuan. Instrumen yang digunakan bagi mengumpul data ialah protokol temu bual tidak berstruktur. Data yang diperoleh melalui protokol temu bual tidak berstruktur ini dianalisis dengan menggunakan pendekatan tematik bagi pembinaan tema untuk menjawab persoalan kajian berkaitan dengan aspek harapan murid terhadap pengajaran karangan. Hasil kajian memperlihatkan lima aspek harapan murid terhadap pengajaran karangan, iaitu pengajaran karangan yang berkualiti, pengajaran karangan yang bertahap-tahap, pengajaran karangan dengan pelbagai kaedah, maklum balas penulisan dan intervensi penulisan. Secara keseluruhan, harapan murid merupakan keperluan murid yang perlu ditumpukan oleh guru bagi memastikan keberkesanan pengajaran karangan.

Kata Kunci: Harapan, Pengajaran Karangan, Pendekatan Tematik, Intervensi

ABSTRACT: Students have many expectations towards their teacher during the learning process. This paper explores aspects of students'    expectations towards essay teaching, seen from the perspectives of three secondary school students. This study adopted the multicase, multisite case study approach. Three form-five students were involved as study participants and were selected through purposeful sampling. A set of unstructured interview protocols was used as a data collection instrument. Data obtained through the unstructured interview protocols were analysed using the thematic approach to construct themes and answer the study questions related to students' expectation in learning essay writing. The results showed five aspects of students' expectations towards essay writing lessons -quality essay teaching, teaching essays in different stages, teaching essay writing through diverse methods, feedback on writing and writing interventions. Overall, teachers should be focused on students' expectations to ensure the effectiveness of essay teaching.

Keywords: Expectation, Essay Teaching, Thematic Approach, Intervention, Teaching Effectiveness


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Rasid Jamian. 2011. Permasalahan kemahiran membaca dan menulis Bahasa Melayu murid-murid sekolah rendah di luar bandar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 1(1): 1-12.

Abrami, E.C. & D’Apollonia, S. 1991. Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness Generalizability of “N=1” research: Comment on Marsh. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30: 221-227.

Aman Shah Syed Ali, & Zamri Mahamod. 2021. Masalah penulisan karangan Bahasa Melayu dalam kalangan murid bukan penutur natif di sekolah rendah. Prosiding Konvensyen Bahasa Melayu 2021.

Bernardo, A.B. 2010. Extending hope theory: Internal dan external locus of trait hope. Journal of International Society for Study of Individual Differences, 49(8): 944-948.

Brookover, W., Schweitzer, J., Schneider, J., Beady, C., Flood, P. & Wisebaker, J. 2008. Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15: 301-318.

Brophy, J.E. 2003. Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75: 631-661.

Burt, C. 1911. Experimental tests of higher mental processes and their relation to general intelligence. Journal of Experimental Pedagogy and Training, 1: 93-112.

Carroll, L. 2003. Through the Looking Glass. New York: Penguin Classics.

Cashin, W.E. & Downey, R.G. 1992. Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Education Psychology, 84: 563-572.

Chall, J. 2007. Learning to Read: The Great Debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Che Zanariah Che Hasan & Fadzilah Abd Rahman. 2011. Pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran kemahiran menulis di sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 1(1): 67-87.

Cochran-Smith, M. 2008. The new teacher education in the United State: Directions forward. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(4): 217-282.

Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C.N. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches. Fourt Edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Darling-Hammond, L. 2007. Recognizing and Enhancing Teacher Effectiveness: A Policymaker’s Guide. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State Schools Officers.

Davidson, C.L., Wingate, L.R., Ramussen, K.A., & Slish, M. 2009. Hope as predictor of interpersonal suicide risk. Journal of Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 39(5): 507-520.

Douglas, A.B. & Alexander, N. 2016. Written corrective feedback: Preferences and justifications of teachers and students in a Thai context. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(3): 99-114.

Ebmeier, H., & Good, T. 2009. An investigation of interactive effects among student types, teacher types and instruction types on the Mathematics achievement of fourth grade students. American Educational Research Journal, 3(4): 23-34.

Ghazali Darulsalam. 2008. Teori dan model Islam. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan JPN Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan, 32: 1-29.

Ghazzoul, N. 2018. Topic sentence coaching: Keys to unlock intricacy of academic writing. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26(2): 999-1018.

Good, T. & Beckerman, T. 2008. Time on task: Anaturalistic study in sixth grade classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 78: 192-201.

Hill, F.M. 2005. Managing service quality in higher education: the role of the student as primary consumer. Quality Assurance in Education, 3: 10-21.

Hortono, H., Anwar, C. & Murtinungrum, A. 2019. Corrective feedbacks and grammar teaching in a situated teaching context of process-based writing. Register Journal, 12(1): 28-48.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 2010. Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya: Jemaah Nazir dan Jaminan Kualiti.

Khatijah A. Hamid. 1996. Wacana dalam teks penulisan: Tinjauan tentang pertautan berdasarkan analisis kohesi dan koheren. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, 1: 868.

Md Fadzil Masri & Zamri Mahamod. 2020. Keberkesanan kaedah Flipped Classroom dalam meningkatkan kemahiran mengolah isi karangan murid-murid sekolah rendah. Journal of Borneo Social Transformation Studies, 6(1): 189-203.

Merriam, & Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 4th Edition. San Francisco: Allyn & Bacon.

Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani & Williams, J. 2014. Harapan murid

bermasalah terhadap pengajaran guru: Satu kajian awal di sebuah di negara maju. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1).

Nee, T.Y. & Muhammad Syawal Amran. 2021. Pembelajaran menggunakan kaedah Brainwriting dalam membantu murid menguasai kemahiran menulis. Sains Insani, 6(2): 39-50.

Norliza Abdullah, Zulkifli Osman & Abdul Munir Ismaill. 2021. Kesan penggunaan peta pemikiran terhadap pengajaran penulisan karangan murid tahun lima. MANU, 32(1): 1–17.

Normiati Batjo & Abdul Said Ambotang. 019). Pengaruh pengajaran guru terhadap kualiti pengajaran guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2): 30-42.

Nurul Aisyah Abdullah, Zamri Mahamod & Nor Azwa Hanum Nor Shaid. 2016. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penulisan karangan Bahasa Melayu pelajar sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 6(2): 1-9.

Nurul Asyikin Md Yatim, Chew Fong Peng & Zuraidah Abdullah. 2020. Tahap pengetahuan pedagogi kandungan guru u Bahasa Melayu sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 10(2): 43-53.

Peterson, S. & Bryon, K. 2008. Exploring the role of hope in job permance: Result from four studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2: 785-803.

Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. 1994. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research" by Jane Ritchie and Liz Spencer in A. Bryman and R. G. Burgess [Eds.]. Analyzing Qualitative Data, pp. 173-194. New York: Longmann.

Roselan Baki. 2003. Kaedah Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Shah Alam: Karisma Publications Sdn Bhd.

Rozita Mohamad Yuneh, Rahim Aman, & Shahidi A. Hamid. 2022. Kesan pengajaran sarana kohesi dalam meningkatkan keupayaan menulis berdasarkan jantina. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 12(1): 1-8.

Steele, C. 2002. Race and the schooling of black Americans. In Psychology is Social: Readings and Conversations in Social Psychology. New York: Harper Collins.

Wineburg, S.S. 2007. The self-fulfillment of the self-fulfilling prophecy. Educational Researcher, 16: 28-36.

Worgan, T. 2013. Hope theory in coaching: How clients respond to interventions based on snyder’s theory of hope. Internatinal Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 7(Special Issue): 100-114.

Wuwuh Yunhadi. 2016. The structural parts of paragraph writing by Indonesian EFL learners. International Journal of EFL, 1(1): 33-43.

Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Zuraini Jusoh, Fadzilah Abd Rahman, Samsilah Roslan, & Norazlina Mohd Kiram. 2013. Pencapaian Bahasa Melayu yang rendah dalam kalangan calon Penilaian Menengah Rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 3(1): 1-11.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.