STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION OF INFORMAL INTERACTION SPACES OF FACULTY BUILDINGS IN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, MINNA, NIGERIA

Olatunde Folaranmi Adedayo, Stephen Ayodele Oyetola, Anthony Ikechukwu Anunobi, Oluwatoyin Abiodun Adebayo

Abstract


Faculty buildings have often been considered as a place for formal activities in terms of learning and teaching by both lecturers and students. Emphasis has always been placed on the formal learning environment by the management of such institutions and also the accrediting bodies of such institutions. The designs of such faculties have also reflected the same emphasis with attention being placed on the formal learning spaces and offices for staff. The informal spaces often found in faculty buildings are treated as secondary with such spaces often evolving as the uses of the building continues. They are usually unplanned places which are created by the students as their needs arise. The aim of this study is to examine how effective these informal interaction spaces have served the students. Four out of Eight faculties were purposively selected from the study area based on the student population, while the students were randomly selected. The data obtained were analysed using descriptive statistics and the results were presented in tables, charts and plates. It was observed that the students were dissatisfied with the designated informal interaction spaces provided by the designs of the buildings, it also showed that informal interaction spaces evolved as solution for waiting periods outside lecture rooms. The study concludes that there was need to design faculty buildings that had lecture rooms linked to open spaces and overflow areas aside from corridors that were predominant in the study area

Keywords


buildings, faculty, informal, interaction, spaces, students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, T.J. and Henn, G. (2006). The Organisation and Architecture of Innovation. Managing the Flow of Technology. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Anon, (2012), Guidelines for Office Space Allocation at UMBC. Retrieved from www.umbc.edu/policies/pdfs/GuidelinesForOfficeSpace.pdf on 28th July 2016

Anon, (2013). York University Keele Campus Student Common Spaces for Casual Use. Retrieved from www.vpfa.info.yorku.ca/files/2013/10/131017-Student-Space-for-Casual-Use.pdf on 15th July 2016

Anon, (2015). Differences between Formal and Informal Communication. Retrieved from www.keydifferences.com on 30th July 2016.

Anon, (2016). Use of University Space, Facilities & Grounds. Retrieved from www.uafacilities.ua.edu/grounds/information/facilities-and-grounds-use-policy.pdf on 14th April 2016

Anon, (n.d), Space Classification Schemes. Coucatdef.pdf. Retrieved from www.osm.utoronto.ca/website/PDFs/coucatdef.pdf on 22nd May 2016

Brooks, D.C. (2010). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01098.x. 1-8

Brown, C. Efstratiou, C., Leonatiadis, I., Quercia, D., Mascolo, C., Scott, J. & Key, P., (2014). The architecture of innovation: Tracking face-to-face interactions with ubicomp technologies

Cox, A.M. (2011).Students’ Experience of University Space: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 23(2), 197-207. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/ ISSN 1812-9129

Cuperus, Y. (2003). Mass customisation in housing an open building/lean construction study. Retrieved from http:/www.y Cuperus-obom.org on 24th February 2009.

Fournier, J., Lane, C. & Lyle H. (2010). Designing Campus learning Spaces: A Report on Students’ Current and Future Needs. Retrieved from https://itconnect.uw.edu/wp-content/.../12/Designing_Campus_Learning_Spaces.pdf on 28th July 2016

Gebhardt, C. (2014). The Spaces between the Rooms: A Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Informal Social Spaces in the HEDCO Education Building. Unpublished BSc Thesis Presented to the Department of Architecture and the Robert D. Clark Honors College. Retrieved from https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/18241 on 8th March 2016

GSA, (2006). Innovative Workplaces: Benefits and Best Practices. GSA Office of Government wide Policy. Retrieved from http://www.gsa.gov/graphics/pbs/Innovative_Workplaces-508_R2OD26_0Z5RDZ-i34K-pR.pdf on the 25th June 2016

Holland, C., Clark, A., Katz, J. & Peace, S. (2007). Social interactions in urban public places. Plymouth, UK, The Policy Press.

Kilic-Calgici, P. Czerkauer-Yamu, C. & Cil, E. (2013). Faculty office building as work environments: Spatial configuration, Social interaction, collaboration and sense of community. ITU AZ, 10(2), 178-197

Knoll, M. (2013). Creating Collaborative Spaces that Work:A Performance-based Approach to Successful Planning. Retrieved from www.knoll.com/research/index.jsp on 17th June 2016

Kraut, R.E., Fish, R.S., Root, R.W. & Chalfonte, B.L. (1990). Informal Communication in Organizations: Form, Function, and Technology in I S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan (Eds.). Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applies Social Psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. (1990)

Kumar, A. & Bhutt, R.K. (2015). Astudy of Using Informal Learning Spaces at Indian Institute of Technoogy, Delhi. Library Philosphy and Practice (e-journal). 1-18

Lansdale M., Parkin J., Austin S., Baguley T. (2011), “Designing for Interaction in Research Environments: A Case Study”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 407-420

Lomas, C. & Oblinger, D.G. (2006). Student Practices and Their Impact on Learning Spaces. Retrieved from www.educause.edu/learningspaces on 17th July 2016

Mackay, W.E. (1999). Media Spaces: Environments for Informal Multimedia Interaction. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Edited by Beaudouin-Lafon ,John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 56-83

Markwell, D. (2007). A large and liberal education: Higher education for the 21st century, Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Press.

Matthews, K.E., Adams, P. & Gannaway, D (2009). The impact of social learning spaces on student engagement. Retrieved from http://www.fyhe.com.au/past_papers/papers09/content/pdf/3A.pdf on 22nd of June 2016

NGLS. (2008). "Next generation learning spaces colloquium", Retrieved from http://www.uq.edu.au/nextgenerationlearningspace/colloquium-2008, on 16th June 2016

Ofide, B. & Jimoh, R. (2016). Building Condition: Rating of Higher Institutions in Niger State. Covenant Journal of Research in the Built Environment (CJRBE) 4(1), 32-48

Onwuka B.N., Adedayo, O.F. & Adedokun Adebayo John (2016). User Assessment of Staff Perception on Relaxation Spaces in Selected Offices of Tertiary Institutions of Niger State. Environmental Technology & Science Journal (ETSJ), 7(1), 63-75

Pentland, A., (2012). The new science of building great teams. Harvard Business Review, 90 (4), 1-11

Radcliffe, D., Wilson, H., Powell, D., and Tibbetts, B. (2008). "Designing next generationplaces of learning: Collaboration at the pedagogy-space-technology nexus" Retrieved from http://www.altc.edu.au/resource-designing-next-generation-places-learninguq-2008, on 31st July 2016.

Rashid, M., Kampschroer, K., Wineman, J. & Zimring, C. (2006). Spatial layout and face-to-face interaction in offices: A study of the mechanisms of spatial effects on face-to-face interaction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33, 825-844.

Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/the-architecture-of-innovation-tracking-face-to-face-interactions-with-ubicomp-technologies/ on 29th June 2016

Sailer, K., Penn, A. (2009), “Spatiality and Transpatiality in Workplace Environments”, 7th International Space Syntax Symposium Proceedings, Stockholm.

Stryker, J. B. & Santoro, M. D. (2012). Facilitating face-to-face communication in high-tech teams, Research-Technology Management, 55 (1), 51-56

Thomson, P. (2007). Working with invisible geography of school exclusion, In K. N. Gulson. & C. Symes (Eds.), Spatial theories of education (pp. 111-130). New York: Routledge.

Unlu, A., Ozener, O.O., Ozden, T. & Edgu, E. (2001). An Evaluation of Social Interactive Spaces in a University Building. Proceedings 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium Atlanta 2001. Retrieved from www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/3sss/papers_pdf/46_unlu.pdf on 13th June 2016

UVA CHARGE Internal Evaluation Team, (2014). An Analysis of Space Allocation in STEM and SBS Departments at the University of Virginia. Retrieved from http://www.advance.virginia.edu/images/Analysis_Space_Allocation_STEM_%20SBS_Departments_UVA.pdf on 29th March 2016

Vischer, J. (2002). Post Occupancy Evaluation: A Multifaceted Tool for Building Improvement, Federal Facilities Council, The National Academy Press, US , Chapter 3, pp. 23 – 34 .

Watson, C. (2003). Review of building quality using post occupancy evaluation, Journal of Programme Education Building, 35, 1 – 5.

Whiteside, A. & Fitzgerald, S. (n.d). Designing Spaces for Active Learning. Impilcations, 7(1), 1-6. Retrieved from www.informedesign.umn.edu

Wolff, B. (2006). Laptop Use in University Common Spaces. Educause Quaterly, 1, 74-76

Worpole, K. and Knox, K. (n.d). The Social Value of Public Spaces. Retrieved from http://www.jrf.org.uk on 16th June 2016

Wulsin, L.R. (2013). Classroom Design-Literature Review. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/provost/space.../SCCD_Final_Report_Appendix_B.pdf on 8th July 2016.

Zubairu, S. N. and Olagunju, R. E. (2003). A Study of Space Planning in Private and Government Office Buildings in Abuja and Minna, Federal University of Technology (F.U.T.), Minna, Nigeria, FUT/UBR/SET/005.

Zubairu, S.N. (2006). Participatory design – Community and User Input in Design. Journal of the Association of Architectural Educators in Nigeria, 5(1), 55-58..


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.