EXPLORING WALKABILITY IN CIVIC HERITAGE SPACES: A PILOT STUDY OF USER PERCEPTIONS IN PADANG KOTA LAMA, GEORGETOWN

Nurul Ashikin Mabahwi, Nurul Bashirah Rusdi

Abstract


This pilot study explores user perceptions of walkability in Padang Kota Lama, George Town, a civic heritage space facing growing mobility and inclusivity pressures. The objective was to examine how users perceive comfort, safety, and connectivity within the pedestrian environment and to assess the feasibility of a mixed-method framework for evaluating walkability in tropical heritage contexts. A structured survey of 42 respondents, complemented by open-ended feedback, was conducted. Reliability analysis indicated acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s Alpha values exceeding 0.70 across all constructs. Preliminary findings suggest widespread dissatisfaction with key dimensions of walkability. More than 60% of participants rated sidewalks as uneven or damaged, and 78.6% reported thermal discomfort due to limited shading. Fewer than one-third perceived pedestrian crossings as safe, while nearly half judged them inadequate. Connectivity was frequently described as fragmented, with routes ending abruptly or lacking signage. Qualitative feedback emphasised the need for shaded routes, covered walkways, barrier-free access, safer crossings, and clearer wayfinding. Interpreted through the Theory of Planned Behaviour, these perceptions reveal how inadequate infrastructure, poor thermal comfort, and safety concerns erode walking confidence and perceived behavioural control. The study provides initial empirical and methodological insights to guide future large-scale investigations. It concludes that improving walkability in civic heritage environments such as Padang Kota Lama requires climate-responsive, user-centred, and inclusive urban design interventions that enhance accessibility, social equity, and sustainable mobility.


Keywords


connectivity; heritage; pedestrian; pilot; walkability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ayob, Z., & Amir, A. R. (2024). Developing urban walkability measures grounded in green urbanism principles using the Delphi survey study. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(34). doi:10.21837/pm.v22i34.1591

Azizan, F., Thalji, N., Rahman, Z., Mansor, S., & Joohari, M. (2024). The influence of pedestrian characteristic on pedestrian speed in urban area: A case study at Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, Kuala Lumpur. Jurnal Kejuruteraan. doi:10.17576/jkukm-2024-36(1)-26

Baobeid, A., Koç, M., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2021). Walkability and its relationships with health, sustainability, and livability: Elements of physical environment and evaluation frameworks. Frontiers in Built Environment, 7. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2021.721218

Basu, R., Colaninno, N., Alhassan, A., & Sevtsuk, A. (2024). Hot and bothered: Exploring the effect of heat on pedestrian route choice behavior and accessibility. Cities. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105435

Bornioli, A., Parkhurst, G., & Morgan, P. (2019). Affective experiences of built environments and the promotion of urban walking. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.006

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25, 652–661. doi:10.1177/1744987120927206

Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 100. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100

Davis, H., Fredericks, J., Foth, M., Caldwell, G., & Parker, C. (2025). The role of participatory planning and design in addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Urban Planning. doi:10.17645/up.10048

De Vos, J., Lättman, K., van der Vlugt, A. L., Welsch, J., & Otsuka, N. (2022). Determinants and effects of perceived walkability: A literature review, conceptual model and research agenda. Transport Reviews, 43(2), 303–324. doi:10.1080/01441647.2022.2101072

Degroote, L., DeSmet, A., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Van Dyck, D., & Crombez, G. (2020). Content validity and methodological considerations in ecological momentary assessment studies on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-00932-9

Distefano, N., Leonardi, S., & Liotta, N. (2023). Walking for sustainable cities: Factors affecting users’ willingness to walk. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su15075684

Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban Design, 14(1), 65–84. doi:10.1080/13574800802451155

Fan, M., Marzbali, M., Abdullah, A., & Tilaki, M. (2024). Using a space syntax approach to enhance pedestrians’ accessibility and safety in the historic city of George Town, Penang. Urban Science. doi:10.3390/urbansci8010006

Fonseca, F., Papageorgiou, G., Tondelli, S., Ribeiro, P., Conticelli, E., Jabbari, M., & Ramos, R. (2022). Perceived walkability and respective urban determinants: Insights from Bologna and Porto. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su14159089

Hajrasouliha, A., & Yin, L. (2015). The impact of street network connectivity on pedestrian volume. Urban Studies, 52, 2483–2497. doi:10.1177/0042098014544763

Harun, N. Z., Nashar, A., & Bachok, S. (2020). Walkability factors for a campus street. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 18(11). doi:10.21837/pm.v18i11.708

Hasan, R., & Napiah, M. (2018). The perception of Malaysian pedestrians toward the use of footbridges. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19, 292–297. doi:10.1080/15389588.2017.1373768

Jacobsen, P., Racioppi, F., & Rutter, H. (2009). Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling. Injury Prevention, 15, 369–373. doi:10.1136/ip.2009.022566

Jaiswal, S., & Lobo, A. (2024). Identifying barriers to walkability within the heritage city of Mysore, Karnataka, India. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 22(30). doi:10.21837/pm.v22i30.1443

Jia, S., & Wang, Y. (2021). Effect of heat mitigation strategies on thermal environment, thermal comfort, and walkability: A case study in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 201, 107988. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107988

Jia, S., Wang, Y., Wong, N. H., Chen, W., & Ding, X. (2022). Influences of the thermal environment on pedestrians’ thermal perception and travel behavior in hot weather. Building and Environment, 226, 109687. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109687

Kadja, C. J., Dandonougbo, I., Korem, A., & Allagbe, B. S. (2025). Pedestrian profile and perception of walkability in Hêvié, Ouèdo, and Togba in Abomey Calavi, Republic of Benin in West Africa. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(3), 2109–2130. doi:10.55214/25768484.v9i3.5752

Kim, D., & Park, S. (2017). Improving community street lighting using CPTED: A case study of three communities in Korea. Sustainable Cities and Society, 28, 233–241. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.016

Kim, S. W., & Brown, R. D. (2022). Pedestrians' behavior based on outdoor thermal comfort and micro-scale thermal environments, Austin, TX. Science of the Total Environment, 808, 152143. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152143

Labdaoui, K., Mazouz, S., Moeinaddini, M., Cools, M., & Teller, J. (2021). The street walkability and thermal comfort index (SWTCI): A new assessment tool combining street design measurements and thermal comfort. Science of the Total Environment, 795, 148663. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148663

Lakens, D. (2021). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology. doi:10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf

Lee, L., Cheung, P., Fung, C., & Jim, C. (2019). Improving street walkability: Biometeorological assessment of artificial-partial shade structures in summer sunny conditions. International Journal of Biometeorology, 64, 547–560. doi:10.1007/s00484-019-01840-9

Li, J., Dali, M., & Nordin, N. (2023). Connectedness among urban parks from the users’ perspective: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20. doi:10.3390/ijerph20043652

Liu, T., & Hwang, Y. (2022). Universal design characteristics of public spaces in urban regeneration cultural and art spaces. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design. doi:10.14774/jkiid.2022.31.1.088

Mohamad, W., Lokman, N., Hasan, R., Awang, A., Hamid, N., Yeo, L., Hassan, K., Ramlee, N., Othmani, N., & Mohamed, S. (2023). Patterns of streets connection for sustainable urban development in Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia. BIO Web of Conferences. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20237305013

Mohite, S., & Surawar, M. (2024). Assessing pedestrian thermal comfort to improve walkability in the urban tropical environment of Nagpur city. Geographica Pannonica. doi:10.5937/gp28-48166

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. doi:10.1177/16094069231205789

Nirjhar, E., Kim, J., Winslow, J., Chaspari, T., & Ahn, C. (2023). Sensor-based detection of individual walkability perception to promote healthy communities. Smart Health. doi:10.1016/j.smhl.2023.100414

Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence Based Journals, 22, 67–68. doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145

Pavlenko, T., Lytvynenko, T., Yenshuieva, T., Pasichna, T., & Zubrychev, O. (2024). Basic principles of universal design and barrier accessibility when designing public spaces in modern conditions. Spatial Development. doi:10.32347/2786-7269.2024.8.148-156

Pendlebury, J., Townshend, T., & Gilroy, R. (2004). The conservation of English cultural built heritage: A force for social inclusion? International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10, 11–31. doi:10.1080/1352725032000194222

Rao, A., Nandineni, R. D., Shetty, R. S., Mallaiah, K., & Kamath, G. B. (2025). Enhancing walkability for older adults: The role of government policies and urban design. Infrastructures, 10(4), 77. doi:10.3390/infrastructures10040077

Rashid, M. F. A., Diah, J. M., & Kordi, N. E. (2018). The improvements on the pedestrian sidewalk towards supporting world class city in Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2020(1), 020024. doi:10.1063/1.5062650

Smith, P., & Little, D. (2018). Small is beautiful: In defense of the small-N design. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 2083–2101. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1451-8

Sonone, S., & Balamohan, N. (2023). Multicriteria approach in developing pedestrian network data for sustainable urban mobility. In The International Conference on Civil Infrastructure and Construction. doi:10.29117/cic.2023.0134

Southworth, M. (2005). Designing the walkable city. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(4), 246–257. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246)

Taher, H., Elsharkawy, H., & Rashed, H. (2024). Urban green systems for improving pedestrian thermal comfort and walkability in future climate scenarios in London. Buildings. doi:10.3390/buildings14030651

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Tchetchik, A., Mathews, Y., Weidenfeld, A., & Fleischer, A. (2023). The role of the spatial relationships between visitor attractions in shaping visiting patterns. Current Issues in Tourism, 27, 154–169. doi:10.1080/13683500.2023.2173055

Valverde-Caballero, L., Mendoza-Salazar, L., Butron-Revilla, C., Suarez-Lopez, E., & Aguilar-Ruiz, J. (2024). Walkability index for world heritage cities in developing countries. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 52, 76–96. doi:10.1177/23998083241250265

Vergara-Hernández, C., Marí-Dell’Olmo, M., Oliveras, L., & Martínez-Beneito, M. (2024). Taking advantage of sampling designs in spatial small-area survey studies. Statistical Modelling, 25, 170–188. doi:10.1177/1471082X231226287

Vetter, T. (2017). Descriptive statistics: Reporting the answers to the five basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125, 1797–1802. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471

Vo, D. C., & Kim, J. (2024). Exploring perceived walkability in one-way commercial streets: An application of 360° immersive videos. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0315828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315828

Xie, Y., Wang, X., Wen, J., Geng, Y., Yan, L., Liu, S., Zhang, D., & Lin, B. (2022). Experimental study and theoretical discussion of dynamic outdoor thermal comfort in walking spaces: Effect of short-term thermal history. Building and Environment, 216, 109039. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109039

Yahya, M. S., & Samat, N. (2020). Penilaian kebolehupayaan pejalan kaki di tapak warisan dunia UNESCO: Kajian kes di George Town, Pulau Pinang. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 16(2). doi:10.17576/geo-2020-1602-07

Yang, X., Zheng, X., Cao, Y., Chen, H., Tang, L., & Yang, H. (2023). Connectivity analysis in pedestrian networks: A case study in Wuhan, China. Applied Geography. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102843

Yildirim, O., Sungur, A., & Ozer, D. (2024). Understanding measurement of walkability in urban environments: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Urban Sciences. doi:10.1080/12265934.2024.2438189

Zacharias, J. (2024). The moderating effects of urban design on willingness to walk in a tropical city. Qeios. doi:10.32388/ksfwos.2

Zulpiani, M., & Rusyani, E. (2023). Application of universal design principles in public spaces for persons with disabilities. Journal of ICSAR. doi:10.17977/um005v7i12023p18

Zumelzu, A., Estrada, M., Moya, M., & Troppa, J. (2022). Experiencing public spaces in southern Chile: Analysing the effects of the built environment on walking perceptions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19. doi:10.3390/ijerph191912577


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.