HUBUNGAN ANTARA TRET PERSONALITI KEHEMATAN, KETERBUKAAN PADA PENGALAMAN, EKSTRAVERSI DAN KEPATUHAN DENGAN PRESTASI KERJA DALAM KALANGAN PEMIMPIN PENDIDIK DALAM SEKOLAH-SEKOLAH PRESTASI TINGGI (HPS) DI MALAYSIA (RELATIONSHIPS OF CONSCIENTIOUSNESS, OPENNESS TO EXPERIENCE, EXTRAVERSION AND AGREEABLENESS PERSONALITY TRAITS WITH JOB PERFORMANCE AMONG EDUCATOR LEADERS IN HIGH PERFORMANCE SCHOOLS (HPS) IN MALAYSIA)

Nurul Hudani Md Nawi, Ma'rof Redzuan, Noor Hisham Md Nawi

Abstract


Hubungan Trait Persoanliti Kehematan, Keterbukaan, Ekstraversi

dan Kesetujuan dengan Prestasi Kerja dalam kalangan pemimpin pendidik Sekolah Berprestasi Tinggi (SBT) di Malaysia

 

Nurul Hudani Md. Nawi, Ma'rof Redzuan, Noor Hisham Md Nawi

Fakulti  Psikologi dan Pendidikan,Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia

 

Abstrak

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan bagi trait personaliti dengan prestasi kerja dalam kalangan pemimpin pendidik di Sekolah Berprestasi Tinggi (SBT). Dua set soal selidik telah digunakan dalam kajian ini iaitu soal selidik Five-Factor Model of Personality (NEO PI-R) bagi mengukur personaliti  dan soal nselidik prestasi kerja bagi  mengukur prestasi kerja individu telah dijalankan ke atas 306 pemimpin pendidik (89%) di 15 buah SBT di Malaysia. Analisis korelasi Pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan positif yang signifikan antara trait personaliti seperti kehematan (Conscientiousness (r=.740, p<.05), keterbukaan (Openness to experiences (r=.419, p<.05), ekstraversi (Extraversion (r=.596, p<.05), kesetujuan (Agreeableness (r=.386, p<.05) dengan prestasi kerja. Analisis kajian juga telah mempamerkan dengan meletakkan kepentingan dimensi kehematan (Conscientiousness) sebagai domain yang paling kuat berhubungan dengan prestasi kerja berbanding dimensi yang lain.  Dari sudut praktikal, penggunaan pemboleh ubah psikologi dan pemilikan hubungan trait personaliti berupaya untuk memperkasakan lagi prestasi kerja sehingga memberi kebaikan kepada institusi pendidikan SBT kerana dapat meningkatkan lagi kualiti perkhidmatan mereka.

 

Kata kunci : kecerdasan emosi, trait personaliti, pemimpin pendidik

 

Abstract

 

The main objective of this cross-sectional study is to determine inter relationship of  personality trait (Conscientiousness, Openness to experiences, Extraversion, Agreeableness) and job performance among school educator leaders in High Performance Schools (SBT). Two sets of questionnaire such as Five-Factor Model of Personality (NEO PI-R) to measure personality trait and job performance to measure individual performance were administered to 306 (89%) subjects who were selected by stratified random sampling in 15 SBT schools in Malaysia. Data were analyzed through inferential statistics such as correlation. The finding by the bivariate analysis using the Pearson correlation method indicates that the personality trait such as Conscientiousness (r=.740, p<.05),Openness to experiences (r=.419, p<.05), Extraversion (r=.596, p<.05), Agreeableness (r=.386, p<.05) are positively and significant correlated with overall job performance among the schools educator leaders. The correlation values of the personality Conscientiousness trait (r=.552, p<.05) are higher than the correlation values of the rest of others personality traits towards job performance. This finding suggests that personality Conscientiousness trait have stronger relationship on job performance compare to the others traits. On a practical note, the assessment of psychological construct in schools setting such as personality trait could possibly assist in enhancing the work performances in delivering huge benefits to the society especially in the educational.

 

Keywords: Emotional intelligence, Personality traits, school leaders


Full Text:

PDF

References


RUJUKAN

Al- Ghazali. (1966). Ajaran – ajaran Akhlak, Surabaya: Penerbit Al- Ikhlas.

Abdul Razak Ibrahin & Ainin Sulaiman. (2000). Gelagat Organisasi.(ed.8). Selangor:Pearson Education Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.

Allport, G.W.(1961).Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Barrick, M.R., & Mount. M.K.,(1991).The big five personality dimensions and job performances : a meta analysis. Personnel Psychology,44,1-26.

Barrick, M.R., & Mount, M.K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationship between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 111- 118.

Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K. & Judge, T.A. (2001). Personality and job performance at the beginning of the new millennium : What do we know and where do we go next ?. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.

Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 43-51.

Bing, M. N., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2000). Openness and job performance in

U. S.-based Japanese manufacturing companies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 515–522.Form S and Form R. Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Bono, J.E., & Judge, T.A.(2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership : A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901-911.

Borman, W.C & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N.Schmitt & W.C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organizations : 71-98. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.

Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R., Oppler, S., & Sager, C. (1993). A theory of performance. In N.Schmint and W. Borman. Personnel selection in organization(pp.35-70). San Francisco: Joossey- Bass.

Costa, P.T., & McCrae,R.R.(1989).NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa.F1: Psychological Assessment Resources.Inc.

Costa, P.T & Mc Crae, R.R.(1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Profesional Manual. Odesse,Fc : Psychological Assessment Resources. Inc.

Coetzee, C. & Schaap, P.(2005). The relationship between leadership behaviour, outcomes of leadership and emotional intelligence. Journal of Industrial Psychology,31(3),31-38.

Digman, J.M. (1990). Personality structure : Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology 41 :417-440.

Goldberg, L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big Five factor

structure. Psychological Assessment.4, 26-42.

Huffman, K. (2007). Psychology in Action.(8th Ed.). USA: John and Wiley.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S.(1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P.John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138).New York: Guilford.

Judge,T. & Bono, J.E. (2000). Relationship of core self-evaluation with job satisfaction

and job performances : A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1),80-

Malek Shah Mohd Yusoff & Nor Shah Mohamed. (2004). Peningkatan prestasi di tempat kerja melalui aplikasi kecerdasan emosi. Jurnal Pengurusan Awam, 3(1), 1-20.

Mahmood Nazar Mohamed. (1990). Pengantar psikologi: Satu pengenalan asas

kepada jiwa dan tingkahlaku manusia. Kuala Lumpur: DBP.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


DISCLAIMER

The editors and publisher of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia have made every possible effort to verify the accuracy of all information contained in this publication. Any opinions, discussions, views and recommendations expressed in the article are solely those of the authors and are not of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors or its publisher. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors and its publisher will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising therefrom.