Penilaian Awal Alat Ukuran Keupayaan Kognitif Umum (Preliminary Assessment Of The General Mental Ability Measurement)
Abstract
The objective of this research is to assess the validity and reliability of the general mental ability instrument that was developed based on Western norms. The instrument comprise 153 items obtained from the International Cognitive Ability Resources (ICAR) categorised into three dimension (3D) rotation, abstract reasoning, figural analogies, letter-number series, matrix reasoning and verbal reasoning. Forty-five (45) masters-programme students from the Human and Social Science Faculty at a local university undertook the 1-hour test. Utilising the Winsteps software, the Rasch meaurement analysis comprising summary statistics, unidimensionality and item-person measures were used to test the validity and reliability of the ICAR. The research findings indicated that the ICAR has good psychometric properties that is acceptable as a mesure of general mental ability. Nonetheless, the findings also indicated that the ICAR was difficult relative to the respondents’ ability. As such, improvements and selection of appropriate item-difficulty level are required to portray a more accurate level of the general mental ability in the local context.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Rujukan:
Asfar, D., Born, M. P., Oostrom, J. K., & van Vugt, M. 2019. Psychological individual differences as predictors of refugees’ local language proficiency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(7), 1385-1400.
Azizi Yahaya. 2008. Kecerdasan. Dlm Hashim, S. & Azizi Yahaya. Psikologi Pendidikan hlm. 41-78. UTM Press: Fakulti Pendidikan/Jabatan Asas Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Azrilah Abdul Aziz. 2011. Rasch Model Fundamentals: Scale Construct and Measurement Structure: Integrated Advance Planning Sdn Bhd.
Blum, D., Holling, H., Galibert, M. S., & Forthmann, B. 2016. Task difficulty prediction of figural analogies. Intelligence, 56, 72-81.
Bond, T. & Fox, C.M. 2015. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. New York: Routledge.
Conrad, K. J., Conrad, K. M., Dennis, M. L., Riley, B.B., & Funk, R. (2009). Validation of the Behavioral Complexity Scale (BCS) to the Rasch Measurement Model, GAIN Methods Report 1.1. Chicago, IL: Chestnut Health Systems.
Edelen, M. O. & Reeve, B. B. 2007. Applying item response theory (IRT) modelling to questionnaire development, evaluation and refinement. Quality Life Research, 16, 5-18.
Fisher, W.P. 2007. Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transactions 21(1): 1095.
Fox, C.M. &. Jones, J.A. 1998. Uses of Rasch modeling in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology 45(1): 30.
Hudiya Adzhar, Aidah Abdul Karim & Muhammad Uzair Sahrin. 2017. Pembangunan Instrumen Penerimaan E-Pembelajaran Pelajar Pascasiswazah Menggunakan Analisis Rasch. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia 42(2): 147-155
Hunter, J. E. 1980. Validity generalization for 12,000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labour, Employment Service.
Hunter, J. E. & Hunter, R. F. 1984. Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72.
Kamphaus, R.W., Winsor, A. P., Rowe, E. W. & Kim, S. 2005. A history of intelligence test interpretation. In D.P. Flanagan and P.L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd Ed.) (pp 23–38). New York: Guilford.
Karim, A.A., Shah P.M., Din, R.& Lubis M.A. 2014. Developing information skills test for Malaysian youth students using Rasch analysis. International Education Studies 7(13): 112-122.
Kline, R. B. 1999. Book review: Psychometric theory. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 17(3): 275-280.
Linacre, J.M. 2011. A User’s guide to WINSTEPS Ministeps; Raschmodel Computer Program. Program Manual 3.73.
Mona Isa, Mazlan Abu Bakar, Ibrahim Sipan, Mohamad Sufian Hasim, Ahmad Ezanee Hashim & Mohd Khairul Anuar Jalil. 2016. Measuring Instrument Constructs of Return Factors for Green Office Building Investments Variables Using Rasch Measurement Model. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 66, p. 00125). EDP Sciences.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N. & Ceci, S. J., et al. 1996. Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.
Nik Hairi Omar & Rusyda Helma Mohd. 2020. Ujian Aptitud Sebagai Pengukur Kebolehpasaran Mahasiswa Sains Sosial. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 34(2).
Olsen, L. W. (2003). Essays on Georg Rasch and his contributions to statistics. (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Copenhagen, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen.
Ones D. S., Dilchert S. & Viswesvaran C. 2012. Cognitive abilities. Rujuk Schmitt 2012, Hlm. 179–224
Reeve, C. L. & Hakel, M. D. 2002. Asking the right questions about g. Human Performance 15, 47–74.
Salgado, J. F. 2017. Personnel Selection. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., De Fruyt, F. & Rolland, J. P. 2003. A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 1068.
Schmidt F.L. & Hunter, J. E. 1998. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 124, 262–274.
Schmidt, F. L. 2002. The role of general cognitive ability and job performance: Why there cannot be a debate. Human Performance 15(1-2), 187-210.
Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. 2004. General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 162.
Sick, J. (2010). Assumptions and requirements of Rasch measurement. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 14(2), 23-29.
Siti Rahayah Ariffin. 2008. Inovasi dalam Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan UKM.
Sumintono, B. & W. Widhiarso. 2014. Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Wright, B. D. & Mok, M. M. 2004. An overview of the family of Rasch measurement models. Introduction to Rasch Measurement: 1-24.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
DISCLAIMER
The editors and publisher of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia have made every possible effort to verify the accuracy of all information contained in this publication. Any opinions, discussions, views and recommendations expressed in the article are solely those of the authors and are not of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors or its publisher. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors and its publisher will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising therefrom.