PENGARUH KETIDAKAKURAN SIVIL TERHADAP PROFESIONALISME ANGGOTA PDRM (THE INFLUENCE OF CIVIL NON-COMPLIANCE TOWARDS THE PROFESSIONALISM OF PDRM’S OFFICERS)
Abstract
Polis Diraja Raja Malaysia (PDRM) is the biggest law enforcement organization in the nation. Therefore, professionalism characteristics are emphasized in job tasks. However, since the year 2005 to 2011 SUHAKAM received 569 reports related to civil non-compliance among PDRM officers that affected PDRM’s professionalism. In relation to that, this study aimed to identify the validity of the claim that civil non-compliance factor affects the professionalism of PDRM’s officers. A total of 223 respondents were selected purposively around the area of Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah Kajang, Selangor administration. Civil non-compliance questionnaire and professionalism questionnaire were established by the reserchers based on community’s reports to SUHAKAM, Smith’s (2004) theory of civil non-compiance, Nayman’s (1973) professionalism model and PDRM’s codes of ethics. Regression analysis results showed that delay in action and power abuse, except excessive brutality subfactor, are the two civil non-compliance subfactors that influence four subfactors of PDRM professionalism. They are expertise, commitment, autonomy and responsibility. Outcome of this study indicates that delay in action factor and power abuse are the main factors that have to be focused by PDRM to change the negative perception of society towards PDRM professionalism. This study gives an impact that society’s belief towards PDRM professionalism can be improved through institutional reinforcement, positive relationship with the community and honesty such as those outlined in the institutional theory. Police officers’ communication skill aspect with youth must also be refined. Future research needs to re-examine professionalism and civil non-compliance concepts from the perspective of PDRM officers and its comparison with the youth group.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adams, C. 2005. Comments Made at the GTCE ‘Battle of Ideas’ Conference, 29-30 Oktober. Akta Polis. 1967. Kuala Lumpur: International Law Book Services.
Barber, M. 2005. Informed Professionalism: Realising the Potential. Kertas kerja yang telah dibentangkan di Association of Teachers and Lecturers, London, 11 Jun.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Cervero, R.M. 1995. An Overview of Continuing Education for the Professions in the United States of America. Kertas Kerja Persidangan Continuing Professional Development: Towards Effective Practice, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor.
Cervero, R.M. 1988. Effective Continuing Education for Professionalism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Esah Sulaiman. 2003. Amalan Profesionalisme Perguruan. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Fatimah wati Halim. 2012. Pengaruh Personaliti, Motivasi Pencapaian dan Efikasi Kendiri Terhadap Prestasi Kerja: Pengujian Model Peramal Prestasi Kerja. Tesis Dr. Fal. Program Psikologi, Pusat Pengajian Siswazah, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
INTAN. 1996. Panduan Etika Kerja Urusetia, Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Awam. Kuala Lumpur: SPA.
Martin C.A. 2005. From High Maintenance To High Productivity: What Managers Need To know About Generation Y. Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 37, Iss: 1: 39 – 44.
Minit Mesyuarat Pegawai Kanan - Kod Etika PDRM. 2001. Bukit Aman, Kuala Lumpur, 21 Julai.
Mohd Tap Salleh. 2007. Rencana: Mencari Persepsi Integriti: Utusan Online. 14 Ogos 2007.http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2007&dt=0814&pub =Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Rencana&pg=re_01.htm [20 Februari 2013].
Nayman, O.B. 1973. Profesional Orientations of Journalists: An Introduction To Communicators Analysis Studies. Gazette XIX: 195-212. Dlm. Mohd Helmi Abd Rahim & Lau Seng Yee. 1992. Profesionalisme dalam Perkhidmatan Akaun Agensi-Agensi Pengiklanan di Malaysia: Suatu Kajian Awal dengan Menggunakan Indeks Profesional Mcleod dan Hawley. Jurnal Komunikasi 8 :11 – 26.
Nik Mustapha Nik Hassan. 2007. Penghayatan Nilai Murni Menjana Prestasi Penjawat Awam. http://www.ikim.gov.my/v5/index.php?lg=1&opt=com_article &grp=2&sec=&key=1468&cmd=resetall [4 Januari 2013].
Olweus, D. 1993. Victimisation by Peers: Antecedents and Long-Term Outcomes. Dlm. K.H. Rubin & J.B. Asendorpf (Eds), Social Withdrawal, Inhabition and Shyness in Childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbraum.
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Massachusetts: Belknap Press.
Scott, R. & Meyer, J. 1983. The Organization of Societal Sector. Dlm. Meyer, J. & Scott,R. (Pnyt). Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. Newbury Park: Sage.
Schaefer, E.J. 1982. An Analysis of the Discourse and Syntax of Oral Complaints in English. Los Angeles: University of California.
Sharifah Hayaati Syed Ismail al-Qudsy, Asmak Ab. Rahman & Mohd Izani Mohd Zain. 2009. Pengukuhan Nilai dan Profesionalisme di Kalangan Penjawat Awam ke Arah Efektif Governan di Malaysia: Pengukuhan Nilai dan Profesionalisme di Kalangan Penjawat Awam ke Arah Efektif. Jurnal Syariah 17 (3): 559-592.
Smith, W. 2004. Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica 10: 353-377.
Sufean Hussein. 1996. Pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
SUHAKAM. 2013. Laporan Tahunan SUHAKAM 2006-2012. http://www.suhakam.org.my/annual_report [20 Februari 2013].
Van Maanen, J. 1973. Observations on the Making of a Policeman. Human Organization 32: 407-18.
Zawiyah & Mohammad Agus. 2012. Ketidakakuran Sivil dan Kesannya ke atas Pendemokrasian di Era Abdullah Badawi. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics and Strategic Studies 39 (1) :1-23.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
DISCLAIMER
The editors and publisher of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia have made every possible effort to verify the accuracy of all information contained in this publication. Any opinions, discussions, views and recommendations expressed in the article are solely those of the authors and are not of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors or its publisher. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors and its publisher will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising therefrom.