CREATIVE PEOPLE TEND TO TELL LIES, ESPECIALLY IN ENRICHED ENVIRONMENT
Abstract
Is dishonesty affected by one’s creativity and environment? Recent studies have documented the effects of creativity and environment on dishonesty respectively. However, little attention has been given to the interaction effect of creativity and environment. Based on the past findings, we hypothesized that creative people may tell more lies in an enriched (vs. scarce) environment. An experiment was conducted on a sample of 97 undergraduate students to examine the moderation effect of environment on the linkage of creativity and cheating. Participants completed a creativity task and a questionnaire on general knowledge about Malaysia. Two-way ANOVA analysis showed that creative participants, as well as those in the enriched environment, were more likely to tell lies than their counterparts. More importantly, the interaction effect of creativity and environment was statistically significant. Specifically, for creative people, they were more likely to cheat in the enriched environment than in the scarce environment. The results not only shed light on the link between creativity and dishonesty but also suggest a new direction for minimizing dishonesty behaviours.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
References
Alvarsson, J. J., Wiens, S., and Nilsson, M. E. (2010). Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7, 1036-1046.
Beaussart, M. L., Andrews, C. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010), Creative Liars: The Relationship Between Creativity and Integrity, Thinking Skills and Creativity. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.10.003
Berman, M.G., Jonides, J., Kaplan, S., (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychology Science, 19, 1207–1212.
Bitner, M.J. (1992). Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees. Journal of Marketing, 56, 57-71.
Brinke, L.T., Khambatta, P., & Carney, D.R. (2015). Physically Scarce (vs. Enriched) Environments Decrease the Ability to Tell Lies Successfully. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1-11. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000103
Campbell, K., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Do You Pursue Your Heart or Your Art? Creativity, Personality, and Love. Journal of Family Issues, 1-25. doi:10.1177/0192513X15570318
Cassarino M., & Setti A. (2015) ‘Environment as “Brain Training”: A review of geographical and physical environmental influences on cognitive ageing’. Ageing Research Review, 23, 167–182.
Creativity Research Journal, 3, 158–165.
Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Runco, M. (2010). The dark side of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761225
Cropley, D., Kaufman, J., & Cropley, A. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105–115.
DeFockert, J.W., Caparos, S., Linnell, K.J., Davidoff, J., (2011). Reduced distractibility in a remote culture. PLoS ONE 6(10): e26337. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026337
De Paulo, B.M., Malone, B.E., Lindsay J.J., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to Deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74-118. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
DePaulo, B. M., & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63–79.
Depaulo, B., Ansfield, M., Kirkendol, S., & Boden, J. (2004). Serious lies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 147–167.
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1-113. doi:10.1037/h0093599
Flach, F. (1990). Disorders of the pathways involved in the creative process.
Creativity Research Journal, 3(2), 158-165. doi:10.1080/10400419009534349
Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2011). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 445–459.
Gino, F., & Wiltermuth, S. (2014). Evil genius? How dishonestly can lead to greater creativity. Psychological Science, 25(4), 973-981.
Glucksberg, S. (1962). The influence of strength of drive on functional fixedness and perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 36–41.
Goldenberg, J., & Mazursky, D. (2000). First we throw dust in the air, then we claim we can’t see: Navigating in the creativity storm. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(2), 131-143.
Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). Creative sparks. Science, 285(5433) September, 1495-1496.
Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-16. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/00225193(64)90038-4
Harris, D.J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2015). Fast and Furious: The Influence of Implicit Aggression, Premeditation, and Provoking Situations on Malevolent Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(1), 54-64. doi:10.1037/a0038499
Huang, L., Gino, F., & Galinksy, A.D. (2015). The highest form of intelligence: Sarcasm increases creativity for both expressers and recipients. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162-177. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.001
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G.P. (1987). Positive Affect Facilitates Creative Problem Solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131.
Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administration Science Quarterly, 24, 285–307.
Kaufman, J.C., Plucker, J.A., & Russell, C.M. (2012). Identifying and Assessing Creativity as a Component of Giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 60-73. doi:10.1177/0734282911428196
Knight, C., & Haslam, S. A. (2010). The relative merits of lean, enriched, and empowered offices: An experimental examination of the impact of workspace management strategies on well-being and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 158-172.
Larson, M., (1999). The Law of Environmental Damage. Liability and Reparation, Stockholm.
Mai, K. M., Ellis, A. P. J., & Welsh, D. T. (2016). The gray side of creativity: Exploring the role of activation in the link between creative personality and unethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 76-85.
Maslow, A. H. (1973). Creativity in self-actualizing people. In A. Rothenberg & C. R. Hausman (Eds.), The creative question (pp. 86–92). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Masri, A. (2012, September 26). Google sites. General Knowledge. Retrieved February 2, 2016, from https://sites.google.com/site/generalknowledgess/48-interesting-fact-about-malaysia
May, R. (1976). The courage to create. New York: Bantam. James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211–226.
McCornack, S. A., & Levine, T. R. (1990). When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of deception. Communication Monographs, 57, 119–138.
Miller, M. J. (1992). Pinocchio syndrome: Lying and its impact on the counseling process. Counseling and Values, 37, 25–31.
Myerson, J. (2007). Focus on: Office design. Architects’ Journal Specification, 1, 23–28.
Planbech, T., & Bosch, C.C.K.V.D. (2015). The Impact of Nature on Creativity – A study among Danish Creative Professionals. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14, 255-263. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.006
Ramm, J., Tjotta, S., & Torsvik, G. (2013). Incentives and creativity in groups. CESifo Working Paper No. 4374, 1-15.
Robinson, W. P., Shepherd, A., & Heywood, J. (1998). Truth, equivocation concealment, and lies in job applications and doctor–patient communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 149–164.
Ruedy, N.E., Moore, C., Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M.E. (2013). The Cheater’s High: The Unexpected Affective Benefits of Unethical Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(4), 531-548. doi:10.1037/a0034231
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2009). Research Methods in Psychology (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999b). A propulsion model of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100.
Tamannaeifar, M.R., & Motaghedifard, M. (2014). Subjective Well-Being and Its Sub-Scales Among Students: The Study of Role of Creativity and Self-Efficacy. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12(1), 37-42. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.003
Tierney, J. (2014, March 23). At airports, a misplaced faith in body language. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nyimes.com/2014/03/25/science/in-airport-screening-body-language-is-faulted-as-behavior-sleuth.html?_r=0
Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A. and Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230.
Vrij,A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Wais, P.E., Gazzaley, A., (2014). Distractibility during retrieval of long-term memory: domain-general interference, neural networks and increased susceptibility in normal aging. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 280.
Walczyk, J. J., Runco, M. A., Tripp, S. M., & Smith, C. E. (2008). The Creativity of Lying: Divergent Thinking and Ideational Correlates of the Resolution of Social Dilemmas. Creativity Research Journal, 20(3), 328-342. doi:10.1080/10400410802355152
Zelinsky, M. (2006). The inspired workspace: Design for creativity and productivity. Gloucester, MA: Rockport.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
DISCLAIMER
The editors and publisher of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia have made every possible effort to verify the accuracy of all information contained in this publication. Any opinions, discussions, views and recommendations expressed in the article are solely those of the authors and are not of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors or its publisher. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors and its publisher will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising therefrom.