QUANTITATIVE STUDY: ASSESSING TECHNOLOGICAL PROBLEM SOLVING AND THINKING SKILLS AMONG PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN

Anna Felicia Diyi, Sabariah Sharif, WK Wong, Muralindran Mariappan

Abstract


This program was conducted to analyze the effect of a robotic program in assessing technological problem solving among primary school children. The content in the  learning module which contain technological problem solving and visible thinking activities has been going through expert validation before it were applied in this study. The instrument used to measure the technological problem solving is Technological Problem Solving Inventory (PSI-TECH). Quasi-experiments was implemented in this study, involving experimental and control group which were equal and homogeneous in selected characteristics. The robotic and basic visual coding program was conducted for 5 months, with an hour of lesson each week, consistent with the school syllabus and activities. Result obtained by collecting the data before and after the program, and quantitative analysis of t-test and MANOVA were used. Result had shown a significance positive value for the experimental group after the program. This study contributes in the field of education, in investigating the technological problem-solving skills among students. In addition, help to diversify the studies in the field of robotics.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Mioduser, D. (2009). Learning technological problem solving – A cognitive/epistemological perspective. In A.T. Jones & M.J. de Vries (ed.). International Handbook of Research and Development in Technology Education., pp.1-19. Sense Publishers.

Varnado, T.E. (2005). The Effects of a Technological Problem Solving Activity on FIRST LEGO League Participants’ Problem Solving Style and Peformance. Phd Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


DISCLAIMER

The editors and publisher of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia have made every possible effort to verify the accuracy of all information contained in this publication. Any opinions, discussions, views and recommendations expressed in the article are solely those of the authors and are not of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors or its publisher. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors and its publisher will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising therefrom.