Linguistic Relativity: Object Categorisation Differences Between Arabic and English Speakers

Abdullah Fahad Bin Dawood, Maya G. Sen, Yan Jing Wu

Abstract


We examined the potential effects of the Arabic grammatical gender system on object categorisation using an online voice attribution task. Compared to native English speakers (including English monolinguals and English-Arabic bilinguals), native Arabic speakers (including Arabic monolinguals and Arabic-English bilinguals) were more likely to assign voices to inanimate objects with a gender that was consistent with the objects’ grammatical gender in Arabic. Interestingly, when assigning genders to objects that do not have an associative stereotypical gender, a male-attribution tendency was found in both native Arabic speakers and native English speakers. Additionally, while native Arabic speakers and native English speakers assigned voices consistently with Arabic GG to objects with an associative stereotypical gender compatible with its grammatical gender in Arabic, they assigned voices to objects with an associative stereotypical gender incompatible with its grammatical gender in Arabic, likely based on object-gender stereotypical associations. Additionally, the performance of Arabic and English monolinguals was highly comparable with that of Arabic-English and English-Arabic bilinguals. We conclude that while the effects of linguistic structure on object categorisation might be generalised to Oriental languages, these effects are constrained and sometimes over-ridden by object-gender stereotypical associations, supporting a fully interactive account of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Rasheed, A., Franklin, A., Drivonikou, G., & Davies, I. (2014). Left hemisphere lateralization of categorical color perception among roman and Arabic script readers. Psychology, 2014.

Alkohlani, F. A. (2016). The problematic issue of grammatical gender in Arabic as a foreign language. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(1), 17-28.

Andonova, E., Gosheva, A., Janyan, A., & Schaffai, J. S. (2007). Second language gender system affects first language gender classification. In Cognitive aspects of bilingualism (pp. 271-299): Springer.

Athanasopoulos, P. (2006). Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 9(1), 89-96.

Bassetti, B. (2007). Bilingualism and thought: Grammatical gender and concepts of objects in Italian-German bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(3), 251-273.

Bassetti, B. A. (2014). Is grammatical gender considered arbitrary or semantically motivated? Evidence from young adult monolinguals, second language learners, and early bilinguals. British Journal of Psychology, 105(2), 273-294.

Beit-Hallahmi, B., Catford, J., Cooley, R. E., Dull, C. Y., Guiora, A. Z., & Raluszny, M. (1974). Grammatical gender and gender identity development: cross cultural and cross lingual implications. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 44(3), 424.

Brysbaert, M., Fias, W., & Noel, M.-P. (1998). The Whorfian hypothesis and numerical cognition: istwenty-four'processed in the same way asfour-and-twenty'? Cognition, 66(1), 51-77.

Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind: Cambridge University Press.

Clarke, M. A., Losoff, A., McCracken, M. D., & Still, J. (1981). Gender perception in Arabic and English. Language Learning, 31(1), 159-169.

Cubelli, R., Paolieri, D., Lotto, L., & Job, R. (2011). The effect of grammatical gender on object categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(2), 449.

Davidoff, J., Davies, I., & Roberson, D. (1999). Colour categories in a stone-age tribe. Nature, 398(6724), 203-204.

Davies, I. R. (1998). A study of colour grouping in three languages: A test of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 89(3), 433-452.

Ellis, L., & Ficek, C. (2001). Color preferences according to gender and sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1375-1379.

Ervin, S. M. (1962). The connotations of gender. Word, 18(1-3), 249-261.

Flecken, M. (2011). Event conceptualization by early Dutch–German bilinguals: insights from linguistic and eye-tracking data. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 14(01), 61-77.

Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought (Cambridge, MA: Harvard). In: University Press.

Fodor, J. A. (2008). LOT 2: The language of thought revisited: Oxford University Press on Demand.

Forbes, J. N., Poulin-Dubois, D., Rivero, M. R., & Sera, M. D.

(2008). Grammatical gender affects bilinguals’ conceptual gender: Implications for linguistic relativity and decision making. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 68-76.

Garvin, P. L. (1958). LINGUISTICS: Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. John B. Carroll (Ed.). American Anthropologist, 60(2), 415-416. doi:10.1525/aa.1958.60.2.02a00480

Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306(5695), 496-499.

Guiora, A. Z. (1983). Language and concept formation: A cross-lingual analysis. Cross-Cultural Research, 18(3), 228-256.

Guiora, A. Z., & Sagi, A. (1978). A CROSS-CULTURAL STUDY OF SYMBOLIC MEANING–DEVELOPMENTAL ASPECTS1. Language Learning, 28(2), 381-386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1978.tb00141.x

He, H., Li, J., Xiao, Q., Jiang, S., Yang, Y., & Zhi, S. (2019). Language and perception: Evidence from Mongolian and Chinese speakers. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 551.

Konishi, T. (1993). The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 22(5), 519-534.

Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: The case of grammatical gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 843.

Kurinski, E., Jambor, E., & Sera, M. D. (2015). Spanish grammatical gender: Its effects on categorization in native Hungarian speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1367006915576833.

Kurinski, E., Jambor, E., & Sera, M. D. (2016). Spanish grammatical gender: Its effects on categorization in native Hungarian speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(1), 76-93.

Kurinski, E., & Sera, M. D. (2011). Does learning Spanish grammatical gender change English-speaking adults' categorization of inanimate objects? Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 14(02), 203-220.

Lambelet, A. (2016). Second grammatical gender system and grammatical gender-linked connotations in adult emergent bilinguals with French as a second language. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(1), 62-75. doi:10.1177/1367006915576832

Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B., & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(3), 108-114.

Miller, K. F., Smith, C. M., Zhu, J., & Zhang, H. (1995). Preschool origins of cross-national differences in mathematical competence: The role of number-naming systems. Psychological Science, 6(1), 56-60.

Moeller, K., Shaki, S., Göbel, S. M., & Nuerk, H.-C. (2015). Language influences number processing–a quadrilingual study. Cognition, 136, 150-155.

Montrul, S., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58(3), 503-553.

Mullen, M. K. (1990). Children's classifications of nature and artifact pictures into female and male categories. Sex Roles, 23(9-10), 577-587.

Nicoladis, E., & Foursha-Stevenson, C. (2011). Language and culture effects on gender classification of objects. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 0022022111420144.

Papafragou, A., & Selimis, S. (2010). Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion. Language and cognitive processes, 25(2), 224-260.

Picariello, M. L., Greenberg, D. N., & Pillemer, D. B. (1990). Children's Sex‐related Stereotyping of Colors. Child Development, 61(5), 1453-1460.

Pinker, S. (1995). The language instinct: The new science of language and mind (Vol. 7529): Penguin UK.

Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature: Penguin.

Sera, M. D., Berge, C. A., & del Castillo Pintado, J. (1994). Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development, 9(3), 261-292.

Sera, M. D., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Burch, M. C., Rodríguez, W., & Dubois, D. P. (2002). When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 377.

Slobin, D. I. (1996). From" thought and language" to" thinking for speaking.".

Thierry, G., Athanasopoulos, P., Wiggett, A., Dering, B., & Kuipers, J.-R. (2009). Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4567-4570.

Vernich, L., Argus, R., & Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, L. (2017). Extending research on the influence of grammatical gender on object classification: A cross-linguistic study comparing Estonian, Italian and Lithuanian native speakers. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, 13, 223-240.

Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Paganelli, F., & Dworzynski, K. (2005). Grammatical gender effects on cognition: implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(4), 501.

Vitevitch, M. S., Sereno, J., Jongman, A., & Goldstein, R. (2013). Speaker sex influences processing of grammatical gender. PloS one, 8(11), e79701.

Xia, T., Xu, G., & Mo, L. (2019). Bi-lateralized Whorfian effect in color perception: Evidence from Chinese Sign Language. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 49, 189-201.

Özgen, E. (2004). Language, learning, and color perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(3), 95-98.

Özgen, E., & Davies, I. R. (2002). Acquisition of categorical color perception: a perceptual learning approach to the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(4), 477.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


DISCLAIMER

The editors and publisher of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia have made every possible effort to verify the accuracy of all information contained in this publication. Any opinions, discussions, views and recommendations expressed in the article are solely those of the authors and are not of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors or its publisher. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors and its publisher will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising therefrom.