Pendekatan MOOC dalam Kalangan Pelajar Asas Keusahawanan: Perspektif Psikologi. (MOOC Approach among Fundamental Entrepreneurship Students: Psychological Perspective)

Norhaiza Khairudin, Aryati Juliana Sulaiman, Marhaiza Ibrahim, Ahmad Zamil Abd Khalid, Mohd Noor Abdul Hamid


This study set out to investigate the use of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs) to improve students' teamwork skills in group project activities for the Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship course among students majoring in Accounting at Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM). Among the group assignments for the Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship course are the preparation of business plans and website development. However, the output produced was found to be unsatisfactory and failed to be completed within the allotted time. This is due to the problem of the lack of cooperation between group members and the time constraints faced by the students. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine how the use of MOOCs can help improve the psychological well-being of students in carrying out group project activities in the Fundamentals of Entrepreneurship course conducted online. This study was conducted using action research. Findings show that learning through MOOCs is an effective method to improve teamwork skills and improve the psychological well-being of Fundamental of Entrepreneurship students. From a psychological point of view, students feel that by using MOOCs platforms such as chat rooms and forums, they are able to improve their teamwork skills to help them complete their group projects with better quality and excellence.

Full Text:



Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408- 437.

Belanger, V., Thornton, J. (2013), Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach - Duke University’s First MOOC.

Blum, E. R., Stenfors, T., & Palmgren, P. J. (2020). Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(7), e17318.

Carey, K., (2013), Obama, Rubio Agree on One Thing: Technology Could Fix the Higher Ed Mess,

Choi, J. M. (2002). External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Research, 33, 181-208

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study.

Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3).

Devine, D. J. (2002). A review and integration of classification systems relevant to teams in organizations. Group Dynamics, 6, 291-310

Dixon, J., Belnap, C., Albrecht, C., & Lee, K. (2010). The importance of soft skills. Corporate Finance Review, 14(6), 35.

Doyle, P., & Fenwick, I. (1975). An Experimental Design for Measuring Advertising Payoff. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 26(4), 693-702.

Duhring, J. (2013). Applying MOOC Lessons to Traditional Classrooms: Tips for Teachers. MOOC News and Reviews (September 2).

Dyer, J. L. (1984). Team research and team training: A state of the art review. In F. A. Muckler (Ed.), Human factors review (pp. 285–323). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society

Emans, B., Van der Vegt, G., & Van der Vliert, E. (2000). Interplay of task and outcome interdependence in generating work team members’ affective responses—some new findings. In M. Vartiainen, & F. Avallone (Eds.), Innovative theories, tools, and practices in work and organizational psychology (pp. 111-124). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

Eriksson, L., Johansson, E., Kettaneh-Wold, N., Wikström, C., & Wold, S. (2000). Design Of Experiments. Principles And Applications, 172-174.

Findlay, P., McKinlay, A., Marks, A., & Thompson, P. (2000). Flexible when it suits them: The use and abuse of teamwork skills. In S. Procter, & F. Mueller (Eds.), Teamworking (pp. 222- 243). London: Macmillian Press Ltd

Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5).

Franz, R. (1998). Task interdependence and personal power in teams. Small Group Research, 29, 226-253.

Freeman, M., & Hancock, P. (2013). Milking MOOCs: Towards the right blend in accounting education. The Virtual University: Impact on Australian Accounting and Business Education, part B, 86-100.

Garcia-Loro, F., Martin, S., Ruiperez-Valiente, J. A., San Cristobal, E., & Castro, M. (2020). Reviewing and analyzing peer review Inter-Rater Reliability in a MOOC platform. Computers & Education, 103894.

Hackman, J. R. (1999). Thinking differently about context. In R. Wageman (Ed.), Research on managing groups and teams: Groups in context (pp. 233 247). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

Hackman, J. R., Wageman, R., Ruddy, T. M., & Ray, C. L. (2000). Team effectiveness in theory and in practice. In C. L. Cooper & E. A. Locke (Eds.), Industrial and organizational psychology—linking theory with practice (pp. 109 129). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Heaney, C. A., Israel, B. A., Schurman, S. J., Baker, E. A., House, J. S., & Hugentobler, M. (1993). Industrial relations, worksite stress reduction, and employee well-being. A participatory action research investigation. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 14, 495 510.

Heller, F. (1998). Myth and reality: Valediction. In F. Heller, E. Pusic, G. Strauss, & B. Wilpert (Eds.), Organizational participation: Myth and reality (pp. 220 249). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Heller, F. (2003). Participation and power: A critical assessment. Applied Psychology: An international review, 52, 144 163

Hemby, K. V., & Crews, M. E. (2005). Integrating university and college career services programs into the business communication curriculum. Journal of Applied Research for Business Instruction. III(1)

Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, O. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69-95

James, R. F., & James, M. L. (2004, December). Teaching career and technical skills in a “mini” business world. Business Education Forum, 59(2), 39-41.

Janz, D., Colquitt, J., & Noe, R. (1997). Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology, 50, 877-904.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). Communicative Action and the Public Sphere Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental Design: Wiley Online Library.

Kop, R., Fournier, H., Mak, J.S.F., 2011. A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? McCutcheon, G., & Jung, B. (1990). Alternative perspectives on action research. Theory Into Practice, 29(3), 144-151.

Lehman, C., & DuFrene, D. (2008). Business communication (15th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western/Thompson Learning

McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice.

McCutcheon, G., & Jung, B. (1990). Alternative perspectives on action research. Theory Into Practice, 29(3), 144-151.

National Research Council, 2012. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC p. 2012

Pappano, L. (2012). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12), 2012.Participant support on massive open online courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 12 (7), 74–93.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods . Thousand Oakes.

Perreault, H. (2004, October). Business educators can take a leadership role in character education. Business Education Forum, 59(1), 23-24

Rapoport, R. N. (1970). Three dilemmas in action research: with special reference to the Tavistock experience. Human Relations, 23(6), 499-513.

Rasmussen, T. H., & Jeppesen, H. J. (2006). Teamwork and associated psychological factors: A review. Work & Stress, 20(2), 105-128. doi:10.1080/02678370600920262

Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Salas, E., Rico, R., & Passmore, J. (2017). The Psychology of Teamwork and Collaborative Processes (pp. 1-11).

Saldana, J. (2009). An introduction to codes and coding. The coding manual for qualitative researchers,3.

Shirky, C., (2012), Napster, Udacity, and the Academy,

Staubitz, T., & Meinel, C. (2017, April). Collaboration and teamwork on a mooc platform: A toolset. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 165-168). ACM.

Stewart, B. (2013). Massiveness+ openness= new literacies of participation. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 228-238.

Strauss, G. (1998). Participation works—if conditions are appropriate. In F. Heller, E. Pusic, G. Strauss, & B. Wilpert (Eds.), Organizational participation: Myth and reality (pp. 190 219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sutton, N. (2002, August 9) Why can’t we all just get along? Computing Canada, (28)16,20.

Tawafak, R. M., Malik, S. I., & Alfarsi, G. (2020). Development of Framework from Adapted TAM with MOOC Platform for Continuity Intention. Development, 29(1), 1681-1691.

Trigwell*, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies In Higher Education, 29(4), 523-536

Van Mierlo, H., Rutte, C., Kompier, M., & Doorewaard, H. (2005). Self-managing teamwork and psychological well-being. Review of a multilevel research domain. Group & Organization Management, 30, 211 235.

Varney, G. (1994). Control and autonomy: The primary determinant of successful applications of self-managing work teams. In M. Beyerlein, & D. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Theories of selfmanaging work teams (pp. 103-118). JAI Press.

Winter, J., Neal, J. C., & Waner, K. K. (2005, Spring/Summer). Student teams learning to cope with conflict. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, XLVII(2), 67-74.


  • There are currently no refbacks.


The editors and publisher of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia have made every possible effort to verify the accuracy of all information contained in this publication. Any opinions, discussions, views and recommendations expressed in the article are solely those of the authors and are not of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors or its publisher. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors and its publisher will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising therefrom.