Theory-of- Mind among Arab Monolingual and Bilingual Children: A Comparative Study

Ruba Abdelmatloub Moawad

Abstract


This study aims to investigate Theory of Mind (ToM) in Arabic monolinguals and Arabic-English bilinguals. We hypothesized that the bilingual group would outperform the monolinguals on ToM tasks. This study well also answers the main question: are there any differences in ToM development between monolinguals and bilingual Arab children. A total of 160 children participated in this study, which employed an exploratory comparative approach. The participants were aged between 3-12 years, and were divided into two groups: Arabic monolinguals, and Arabic-English bilinguals. Hutchins and Prelock’s Theory of Mind Task Battery was used, we applied the Arabic version, that was translated and adapted to Arabic by Moawad (2017). Results indicated that bilinguals perform better than monolinguals on subtask (I) the second-order falsebelief only, and on ToM total score, and females outperform males in general on the ToM total score, results are discussed in the light of different issues


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arslan, B., Hohenberger, A., & Verbrugge, R. (2017). Syntactic recursion facilitates and working memory predicts recursive theory of mind. PloS One, 12(1). 1-23. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169510.

Bialystok, E. (1999). Cognitive complexity and attentional control in the bilingual mind. Child Development, 70 (3). 634-644.

Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development. In Handbook of bilingualism: psycholinguistic approach. (Ed,s: J. Kroll. & A, De Groot) 417-432. Oxford University Press, USA.

Bialystok, E., & Codd, J. (1997). Cardinal limits: evidence from language awareness and bilingualism for developing concepts of number. Cognitive Development, 12. 85–106.

Bialystok, E. & Majumder, S. (1998). The relationship between bilingualism and the development of cognitive processes in problem solving. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19 (1). 69-85.

Bosacki, S. L. (2000). Theory of mind and self-concept in preadolescents: Links with gender and language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 709-717. DOI: 1O.1037//O022-O663.92.4.7O9

Carlson, S.M. & Moses, L.J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. Child Development, 72 (4). 1032-1053.

De Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua 117 (11). 1858-1878.‏

Farhadian, M. Abdullah, R. Mansor, M. Redzuan, M. Gazanizadand, N. & Kumar, V. (2010). Theory of mind in bilingual and monolingual preschool children. Journal of Psychology, 1 (1). 39-46.

Farhadian, M. Abdullah, R. Mansor, M. Redzuan, M. Kumar, V. & Gazanizadand, N. (2010). Theory of mind, birth order, and siblings among preschool children. American Journal of Scientific Research, 7. 25-37.

Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. word, 15(2), 325-340.

Flavell, J. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50 (3). 274-290.

Goetz, P. (2003). The effects of bilingualism on theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6 (1). 1-15. doi:10.1017/S1366728903001007.

Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H. (1992). Why the child's theory of mind really is a theory. Mind & Language, 7 (1 & 2). 145- 171.

Gordon, A. C., & Olson, D. R. (1998). The relation between acquisition of a theory of mind and the capacity to hold in mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68(1). 70-83.‏

Hughes, C. (2004). What are the links between theory of mind and social relations? Review, reflections, and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13 (4). 590-691.

Hutchins,T.L., Prelock, P.A. & Chace, W. (2008). Test-retest reliability of a theory of mind task battery for children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23 (4). 195-206.

Kalbe, E., Schlegel, M., Sack, A.T., Nowak, D.A., Dafotakis, M., Bangard, C., ... & Kessler, J. (2010). Dissociating cognitive from affective theory of mind: a TMS study. Cortex, 46(6), 769-780.‏

Kovács, A. (2009). Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false-belief reasoning. Developmental Science, 12 (1). 48-54.

Lecce, S., & Bianco, F. (2018). Working memory predicts changes in children’s theory of mind during middle childhood: A training study. Cognitive Development, 47, 71-81.

Leslie, A.M. (1994). Pretending and believing: issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition, 50. 211-238.

Lu, H.J., Su, Y., & Wang, Q. (2008). Talking about others facilitates theory of mind in Chinese preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1726-1736.‏

Milligan, K., Astington, J.W., & Dack, L.A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: meta‐analysis of the relation between language ability and false‐belief understanding. Child Development, 78(2). 622-646.‏

Moawad, R.A. (2017). Validation of the Arabic Version of the Theory of Mind Task Battery. Arabic Studies in Education and Psychology (ASEP), 87.

National Center for Assessment. (2017). http://www.qiyas.sa/ApplicantsServices/SchoolsRank/Pages/Top10Q.aspx. Retrieved August 23- 2017.

Nawaz, N., & Jahangir, S. F. (2015). Effects of memorizing Quran by heart (Hifz) on later academic achievement. Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 3(1), 58-64.

Nguyen, T. & Astington, J. (2012). Reassessing the bilingual advantage in theory of mind and its cognitive underpinnings. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (2). 396-409.

Palmer, J. (2008). Arabic diglossia: Student perceptions of spoken Arabic after living in the Arabic-speaking world. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 15, 81-95.

Perner, J., Kloo, D., & Gornik, E. (2007). Episodic memory development: theory of mind is part of re‐experiencing experienced events. Infant and Child Development, 16(5). 471-490.‏

Rubio-Ferna´ndez, P. & Glucksberg, S. (2012). Reasoning about other people’s beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38 (1). 211–217.

Scholl, B. & Leslie, A. (1999). Modularity, development and ‘theory of mind’. Mind & Language, 14 (1). 133-153.

Slade, L., & Ruffman, T. (2005). How language does (and does not) relate to theory of mind: A longitudinal study of syntax, semantics, working memory and false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23 (1). 117-141.‏

Strasser, K., & Río, F. D. (2014). The role of comprehension monitoring, theory of mind, and vocabulary depth in predicting story comprehension and recall of kindergarten children. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2). 169-187.‏

Wagner, D. A. (1978). Memories of Morocco: The influence of age, schooling, and environment on memory. Cognitive Psychology, 10(1), 1-28.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


DISCLAIMER

The editors and publisher of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia have made every possible effort to verify the accuracy of all information contained in this publication. Any opinions, discussions, views and recommendations expressed in the article are solely those of the authors and are not of Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors or its publisher. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, its editors and its publisher will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential, special, exemplary, or other damages arising therefrom.